English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

well, guess what...


They weren't on Yahoo.

2007-05-14 14:28:05 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Civic Participation

14 answers

Somewhere along the line the right stopped if someone is offended. And someone is always offended.

2007-05-14 14:33:28 · answer #1 · answered by John A 4 · 0 1

.The responsibilities that come with freedom are meant to inform, instruct, and warn of a real disaster. In the process of expressing your freedom there should be no casualties. The truth may require that you use words wisely. This is not like a job at the news paper where you have a reputation and a history. The people that are participating seem to walk a fine line on slander, character assassination, needless panic, and obnoxious conspiracy theory's.

2007-05-14 15:34:22 · answer #2 · answered by Pablo 6 · 1 0

Freedom of speech is respected in the United States as long as the writings are not against morals, public order and laws.

2007-05-14 14:32:56 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 0

You're NOT free to write whatever you want on somebody else's website. If you don't like it, go get your own website. Yahoo has the right to delete whatever it wants. Freedom of speech means the government can't censor you. It doesn't mean you can use somebody else's website to spew whatever you want.

2007-05-14 14:31:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Freedom of speech only protects you from government interference. Yahoo is a private company, and the First Amendment wasn't meant to protect you from private action.

2007-05-14 14:31:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

there are a number of Democrats here. unfastened Speech and suggested unfastened selection are antithetical to and can't be reconciled with Democrat coverage demands. Democrats bring up criminals as their icons and mentors. Democrats overtly decry the recommendations of family contributors and private accountability and declare self-reliance is impossible. Democrats declare being on the government " dole " is the only valid way of life selection. Democrats declare truthfully rights do not and can't exist: that privileges government forces OTHERS to grant are the only "rights." Democrats declare gender is a synthetic build. Democrats declare you're ENTITLED to in besides you may get government to stress OTHERS to grant you. Democrats declare "top & incorrect" are synthetic and risky constructs and that claiming any distinction exists is itself evil. Democrats declare bureaucrats who will under no circumstances meet you comprehend greater effective THAN YOU DO a thank you to handle not in basic terms your desires yet your needs besides. Democrats declare the very life of country and Americanism are illegitimate, that the pre-country international is the organic state to which we could return. They call this "progression." Democrats declare it is stupid and primitive to not be promiscuous or get pregnant out of wedlock; that it is faulty if a guy did the " top difficulty " and married the lady and " provided " financially and emotionally for the lady and toddler. Democrats declare it is faulty to HAVE a artwork ethic. Democrats WILL DENY each and anyone of those issues. i'm uncertain if this is in spite of how fairly undemanding it is to locate their popularly chosen LEADERS announcing them or if it is because of the fact of it.

2016-12-11 09:35:23 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Freedom in America is just an illusion, people are forced to be part of the system, in order the system to work. Americans know their cost of living. they pay a lot for their so called "freedom"(great system). ask them about their life and they're always likely to complain. that's why american protects their assets so much, it is very valuable to them. FREEDOM = AMOUNT SPENT. if anything they think might disrupt or alter the system, they have to act accordingly. in their boundaries it is considered balance, but through time it is getting expensive.

2007-05-14 16:46:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Gentleman. Once when in england freedom bill was introduced. One G.Man was coming in street with his handstock encircling in air.His stick hit another man coming from opposite direction. He said what are u doing man, he replied it is my right to move my stick.The other man said u fool ur right end where my nose come. So freedom to speak ,freedom to write,freedom to criticise is always cornered with some bounds. In India is bound be Defence of India rules, so is with USA.

2007-05-14 14:35:15 · answer #8 · answered by desigob_05 2 · 1 0

Freedom of speech doesn't give people the right to say things that are threatening to others. Is that what you did?

2007-05-14 14:32:26 · answer #9 · answered by JAN 7 · 1 0

They were in Yahoo too.
But we do have to give others a break.
When they were living in misery with communication problems out there.
Sometime we do have to kick them on their butts to shake and wake them up on the blunders and slip-up with human errors being expose with time created back in the past that passes by our daily lives without anyone noticing it.
It was not meant to offend others.
Just to shake up the dirty old men out there.
So they look into the mess they created in own backyards.
If little horror chucky and the were-wolves never expose the blunders and slip-ups with human errors.
Never even know what went wrong out there.
With them living in misery in own backyards.
Thanks to their exposure.
Were able to trace the faults.
Now is to solve the mess.

2007-05-14 22:20:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers