English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There are lawbreaking, immoral employers in America who willingly exploit, use and take advantage of the illegals they hire. The illegals willingly accept this mistreatment as a step up from where they come from. SUPPLY AND DEMAND.

In return for willingly accepting such mistreatment, illegals expect that their wrongdoing, lawbreaking, and other undesirable actions should be overlooked. They see how it is that here in America all is not honest and according to the law coming from their dirty employers. So they feel that it is okay for them to follow suit and be dishonest too, in breaking the immigration laws.

We have to solve the problem on both sides. We must oppose lawbreaking employers and fight for zero tolerance on both sides if we are to successfully solve the problem of illegal immigration.

We don't want either element to exist in America. Both sides are running down the standard of life and living in this nation. The masses must punish both by withholding our dollars.

2007-05-14 10:05:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

11 answers

I agree with you. There are some places, and manufacturers, that I do boycott. There are some Americans here in the U.S. that are just as much to blame as the illegals that are working the jobs.

2007-05-14 10:11:15 · answer #1 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 2 0

I am sure eventually taxpayers will sue by starting a class action lawsuit against Mexico. Lawyers will make billions in fees from the suit, and taxpayers will be getting checks in the mail.

1) Each year, illegal aliens cost california citizens over $1,000 yearly.
2) California spends over $10 billion yearly on illegal aliens. That is $50 billion dollars in 5 years.
3) Illegal aliens almost bankrupted the state a few year ago. The state had to take out loans to cover its debt. That caused the state to have nearly a junk bond status which cost taxpayers nearly a billion dollars.
4) Because California's government is nearly bankrupt, Arnold Schwarzenegger asked California voters to approve a $55 billion bond measure to rebuild levees, bridges, schools, and prisons. California voters would not have to pass the measure if illegal aliens were not in the state. Taxpayers must pay for the bonds and for the interest on the bonds.

2007-05-14 10:11:01 · answer #2 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 2 0

There are more than just two sides to contend with here. Illegal immigration contains many different issues. The harder to solve is the moralistic views.
With everyone trying so hard to be so politically correct for fear of being called a racist, we are letting the minority become the ruling majority! We can state the truth and still be nice at the same time. Why does it seem as only the MORE intelligent people are the ones who are registered to vote?

2007-05-14 10:22:24 · answer #3 · answered by pacer 5 · 2 0

The problem is even if you close off every oppounity for illegall to get work there always the black market. Business will bark about complicance with the rules. If business want cheap low skilled work they would have to sponsor each one, and pay a bond on the worker, and provide housing for the lowskilled. Immigraiton needs to be fixed soon, and illegal immigrants should be indentiflied. More legal channel channels for migrants would help, and stop promoting immigration based on blood lines. Skilled workers, and enterprisers how create jobs for the American citizen should get perfernce for visas over family ties. Based work visa on education certification verified job refernces. English based test for a work visa for higher skilled where a ELTS score of 5 or above would be require for a visa to be issuse. Just borrrow Austrailia immigration system and tailor it to American needs. Instead of INS catching them on the border just give the job to millitary people to perform.

2007-05-14 12:19:24 · answer #4 · answered by ram456456 5 · 0 0

That would certainly be half of a sound immigration policy.

The other half would be allowing more /legal/ immigrants into the country to do jobs that we're short on Americans for. That's not just jobs like picking strawberries (there are more than a few Americans who should be out there in the fields), but also jobs, like engineers, where we just don't have enough graduates to meet climbing demand.

2007-05-14 10:28:09 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1 0

will never happen.
Example - walmart was caught several times with illegal employees,they pay the fine and moved on.People will still shop there to save a buck even if they are so bad for the economy and hire illegals.
USA is run on greed,you can't stop an american hiring an illegal housekeeper if that's gonna save her the money for the next designer bag

2007-05-14 10:13:13 · answer #6 · answered by RX 5 · 1 2

that would be the ideal thing,but democrats need votes,and they will not give up their only chance to stay in power!

2007-05-14 10:10:24 · answer #7 · answered by truckman 4 · 1 0

If that's what they want then they should do it. People should always do what they truly want to do and what seems to them fit and moral.

2007-05-14 15:19:52 · answer #8 · answered by Lola 2 · 0 0

americans are tooooo lazy

2007-05-15 17:32:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Id like to see you try

2007-05-14 10:17:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers