What part of morality do you think atheists cannot explain?

Question

Or have difficulty explaining?

Answer 1

everyone has difficulty explaining morality,

If we didn't, then we all wouldn't be fighting

Answer 2

There is no evidence that faithful people are demonstrably more moral, nor any evidence suggesting that atheists are either less moral or lack an understanding of morality that those who follow religions have. The only thing that would differ, I think, would be the supposed source of morality, and even that wouldn't be consistent, as each group is so diverse.

Answer 3

If they believe in an objective standard (although I can't think of any that do), how an objective standard (not belief in an objective standard, but the objective standard itself) could have arisen from amoral (not immoral, check the definitions for the difference) material.
If they don't believe in an objective standard, how they can determine what morality is since x and not-x would be as equally moral if there's no objective standard.

Note: let me repeat that I don't think that atheists can't be moral, just that I have yet to see an explanation how a belief that one should be moral is consistent with atheism.

Answer 4

Difficulty explaining?

I think and speak for myself. Nothing difficult about that. I take responsibility for my own actions. Not terribly complicated.

Never needed a crutch or scapegoat to justify my thoughts, beliefs, words or actions.

A good, clean respectful life is not that hard to manage, quite honestly.

Thanks for asking.

Answer 5

Ummmm, none.

Why would an Atheist have any difficulty explaining morality?

Answer 6

I hope atheists understand and practice morality the same as I hope everyone does. I do not expect you to explain it to me.

The Ol' Hippie Jesus Freak
Grace and Peace
Peg

Answer 7

None of it. No, I'm agnostic but most of my beliefs are of an atheistic timbre, if you want me to explain where my morality comes from then I'll elaborate but this isn't what your question is actually about.

Answer 8

Morality and religion have nothing in common; it's just that religious people find it easier to be hypocritical.

There are plenty of child abusing or drunken priests and preachers around to demonstrate the point.

Morals do not come from a book; they're learned through good upbringing and experience and reinforced by clear thought and common sense. Being able to quote endless texts from a 2,000 year-old book and sitting in a church every Sunday may make you FEEL more moral but that's just part of the brainwashed delusion that religionists are under.

Answer 9

"Survival of the fittest" is a sort of issues describing evolution that confuses some people... "fittest" would not propose greatest or optimum, yet those extra probably to stay to tell the tale. a team of people who do no longer kill one yet another would be extra probably to stay to tell the tale... It does get extra complicated, yet organic decision favors cooperation. people, like many different social or p.c.. animals, have stronger with morality hardwired into our genes. Societies have different cultures and regulations, yet an excellent a lot of them are regular. Killing, theft, infidelity, rape, unfavorable somebody else's belongings, and particularly some extra are banned throughout the time of all humanity, and those issues additionally are "outlawed" in communities of chimps, wolves, gorillaz, prairie dogs, and so on. certainly with maximum social animals there are unstated regulations that gets an offending member pushed off. A chimp that steals nutrition or components from yet another (surprisingly a woman or pregnant woman) would be killed or chased off. people additionally see all those issues as immoral, this is customarily the punishments that are different (some cultures will cut back off a thief's hand working example mutually as others will imprison them). this is fairly a captivating project and one i do no longer probably have time to get into at length, yet there is an evolutionary clarification for each little bit of our morality - in certainty evolution could require that we advance morality via fact the organic consequent. From an evolutionary viewpoint, our species can no longer stay to tell the tale if we've people incompatible with society and our social beings. If somebody is killing us, raping us, stealing our nutrition, and so on then they seem to be a downside to our survival and could desire to be dealt with. Even christians don't get their morality from the bible, they cherry p.c.. in line with what they like and what suits with the modern morality on the time. Morality is changing and people have become extra considerate and morally conscious. In WWII 1000's of infantrymen died in an afternoon and we did no longer care plenty, yet now we get uspet whilst a pair die. we additionally are extra accepting of alternative races and ladies, transforming into extra morally conscious - and that's a competent factor. individually i'm getting particularly some my morality from jap philosophy, yet I know that morality is inherent in all people on condition that's what evolution favourite we've.

Answer 10

I have no problem explaining all of morality through purely natural mechanisms.

Answer 11

Morality has nothing to do with religion, and all religious claims to be repositories of morality are without foundation. Moral codes derive from evolution, which applies to societies as well as to species: a society which lives by a sound moral code will survive preferably to one that does not.