Or can we wallow in it's humor through the day? It's monday it's hard to think of new things when you're still hung over!
2007-05-14 05:42:41 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No...those are going to be classics for a long, long time...it is kind of sad though for the christians...that in the *great debate*, the banana and the crocoduck *theories* are all they have to convince us of god's existence...it's funny but in a sad kind of way.....
2007-05-14 05:48:01 · answer #1 · answered by Stormilutionist Chasealogist 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Other than mocking Mr. Cameron's use of the crocoduck as evidence that there isn't much genuine evidence of evolution, no one has really trotted a valid argument against it.
If evolution were true, why aren't we seeing transitions of animals now? If evolution were a continuous process, surely we would see something transitional now. (Or is nature taking a break?)
The problem is this: People don't want to be answerable to a Holy God. If God were real, and He meant the Ten Commandments, we might actually have to obey. We wouldn't be able to indulge our flesh. With evolution, nothing matters. We're all accidents of nature anyway. Might as well live for pleasure all the time. Get what we can while we can.
2007-05-14 13:02:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sorry Courtney I don't know who Kirk Cameron is, or anything about crocoduck, but it is not time to get over bananas I love them.
Can I also tell you that if you press the discovery button, it lets you see settled questions, and sometimes they inspire me to write other questions, I also find inspiring questions by looking at the answers of other people, I hope you don't mind.
2007-05-14 13:21:03 · answer #3 · answered by FairyBlessed 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That sounds like a really twisted porn movie title: Kirk Cameron with a Crocoduck and a banana.
*shudders*
2007-05-14 12:52:29 · answer #4 · answered by Maverick 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Go ahead and wallow. It won't be long before he (or some other christian) comes up with a new absurdity. After all, that is their specialty.
2007-05-14 12:47:39 · answer #5 · answered by Jensenfan 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Just between u and me, Kirk was never no atheist, maybe agnostic, but no athiest would ever say that science is a fairytale.
2007-05-14 12:52:57 · answer #6 · answered by FaceFullofFashion 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I still can't think of banana's without smiling, my family wants to know why I start giggling when I see one.
2007-05-14 12:56:43 · answer #7 · answered by Aria 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess you do have a point, seeing as though the religious scandals and idiotic statements to laugh at.
2007-05-14 12:50:28 · answer #8 · answered by renamed 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, I left here Friday and it was still amusing. I thought over the weekend they would have gotten bored of it. I thought wrong.
2007-05-14 12:45:36 · answer #9 · answered by AJM 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2007-05-14 13:43:18 · answer #10 · answered by beano™ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋