2007-05-14 04:53:56 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yup. It is a double negative. =0)
2007-05-14 04:58:29 · update #1
None. I don't need to not disprove nothing to noone.
2007-05-14 05:01:07 · answer #1 · answered by Klawed Klawson 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You can't disprove non-belief; at least non-belief in a God, if that's what you are trying to say.
Non-belief exists. You can't disprove something that exists.
Now, if you are trying to discuss the difficulties in proving that non-belief in a God is wrong, you are in trouble there as well, as you have no proof that a god exists. You may have suspicions, you may have faith, and you may have subjective experience. None of these though, is sufficient to prove that some god does exist.
Valid scientific exercises do not approach a subject with a predetermined outcome. Valid science goes about its work with explaining what is observed. That is why religion and science are so at odds over evolution. Science sees multiple species that are somehow related. It attempt to describe how this happened. Christianity looks at the Bible and says simply "God made them all". It chastises science for looking deeper, and attemtps to ridicule it. This is why atheism looks down on religion as more than another viewpoint. A religion that seems to have disdain for the search for truth is not to be valued among those searching for such truth.
The difficulty that many religions face is in trying to convince others that they have an open mind while simultaneously discounting or ignoring physical evidence of physical realtiy.
2007-05-14 05:05:03 · answer #2 · answered by Deirdre H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did some crazy broad actually say "they ignore scientist who say evolution is wrong?" A scientist that doesn't believe in evolution? Is he also against the lie the liberal media has been perpetuating about the Earth revolving around the sun? For the love of god, evolution is not up for debate, I'm sorry if it makes your beliefs wrong, but it's a fact suckas. It doesn't disprove there is a god, but it does disprove the world being 7 thousand years old.
2007-05-14 06:59:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't dream of trying to disprove non-belief. It's very real.
Nor do I have the power to change anyone's non-belief. I can hope to plant a seed in someone's mind that sends them down a different path of thought, which may or may not be fruitful.
2007-05-14 04:59:27 · answer #4 · answered by cmw 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
People
2007-05-14 04:57:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I have come across difficulties trying to have logical arguments with believers. It's absolutely impossible to have rational discussions with them. It makes me wonder if their belief actually impairs brain function.
2007-05-14 05:04:39 · answer #6 · answered by Nature Boy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Church people refuse to believe that God was created by Biggod.
They deny the power and glory of Biggod.
By difficulty in refuting their denial is basically my lack of motivation as well as their lack of common sense.
2007-05-14 05:00:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I have never tried to disprove no-belief.
2007-05-14 04:58:11 · answer #8 · answered by rosbif 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
They ignore scientist who clearly say "Evolution" is wrong, They ignore Historic facts and they are brain-washed by the Media and tell everyone that they "are being brain-washed."
Trying to ask them a simple questions is like trying to control a 2 year old in a grocery store.
2007-05-14 05:01:13 · answer #9 · answered by chersa 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Isn't that a double negative?
2007-05-14 04:57:11 · answer #10 · answered by Morg 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋