Do You Agree That The Aryan Invasion Theory Is A LIE, and Its Teaching Serves Political Purposes???

Question

One of the biggest lies in the entire history of India has been that of the so called "Aryan Invasion Theory".
This theory was first introduced to the world by the British, when they ruled India, and it's purpose was to keep Indian society divided in order to make it easier for them to rule.

The theory itself argues that ancient Indian society was ruled by Dravidians and there that there was a huge invasion by "Aryans" who were from Russia and central Asia. The theory argues that these Aryans brought the Vedic religion to India. The British also cooked up some stupid idea that all Brahmins and fair skinned Indians were of Aryan descent and all "lower caste" Indians and dark skinned Indians were of Dravidian descent.

The Aryan Invasion Theory is one of the biggest myths propagated about Indian history. Not only has there been no scientific / archaeological evidence to corroborate the Aryan Invasion theory, but furthermore, there has been an abundance of evidence to refute it.

The predominant reason that the British introduced this dirty piece of fiction into Indian classrooms was because, in light of the fact that India was first ever unified under the British Raj, the British were worried that there would be the establishment of Hindu unity and Hindu nationalism (that would cut across caste and creed) which could challenge their rule. That is why they sought to present Indian civilisation as a civilisation that was comprised of many completely different heterogeneous races.

My question is, that “By Refusing To Correctly Nullify The Aryan Invasion Theory As A Historically Incorrect Myth And By Continuing To Wrongly Teach It As A Historical Fact, Are The Communists/Leftists/Secularist... Who Comprise The Indian Government Carrying On The Antecedents Of DIVIDE AND RULE Established By The British Predecessors???

Because let’s face it, the moment that Hindus unite by breaking out of caste and creed, and establish their Hindu religion as the first criteria of their identity, the first people to lose out would be the Communists / Leftists and Secularists who are currently oppressing the Indian population.

Answer 1

I agree with you. Ths is new and foreign brother.

Aryan is a sanskit word referring to nobility or purity of character. This can refer to any person be he a dravidian, black or white. The best of aryans realise the Personality of Godhead and are free from bodily identification.

Now there are are several facts to support what you say. From a linguistic, scriptural, genetic etc. viewpoint this foreign theory seeks to impose the bodily conception on the people who thought far deeper. If only from a historical point of view is taken- How can Lord Rama and Lord Krishna - both descibed as blackish in colour be aryan if we do consider this nonsensical theory.

This is the problem with the uneducated is they learn the foreign propaganda which is continuously being taught although now some revision is being looked into in many universities. The saddest thing is that indians themselves accept this. There is only one people of India- the greeks, arabs, english etc. have left their genetic material in Bharata mixing with that race.

Still if one does not appreciate the true quest of the vedas- The ''hindu'' or indian lives in name only a follower of the ancient Sanatana Dharma.

Answer 2

Many scholars now say that it was more an Aryan(Indo-Iranian speaking) migration over a period of timefrom 1500BC than an invasion . Sanskrit is much closer to German,Russian ,Hittite,Armenian or Lithuanian than it is to Dravidian languages.The Indus Valley Civilization was already on the skids and much of Hindu religious culture,practices and beliefs may well be from earlier Indian cultures. The "Noble Ones" Indo-Aryans may have mixed with the Harappans,etc and may have co-existed for a long time. The religion and culture expressed by the Vedas are very much like the pre-Zoroastrian Iranian.
IMHO Hinduism would be better off without any form of caste system.

Answer 3

LOL, who cares?

Whether the Aryans took over India thousands of years ago or not doesn't have any bearing on today. That's a funny thing about history - people get all worked up about proving that they know "what really happened" in ancient history, even though it really doesn't matter.

Whether people are Aryan descent or "true Indian natives" makes no difference - they are still equal and should be treated equally.

And to think that proving "the Aryan Invasion" didn't really happen would instantly rid the Indian populace of it's racial division is idiotic. Every country has racial division based on differences in appearance, and that has nothing to do with ancient history and be changed by changing peoples' beliefs of something that happened long, long ago.

Your time would be better spent teaching/preaching the merits of equality and why racial division is foolish and harmful than trying to convince people that inequality exists because of something that happened (or didn't happen) thousands of years ago.

Answer 4

Historical documents which are so called proofs are also subject to modifications. It can very much be crafted for a Political purpose.
But turth holds its legs firm no matter what. If we are to believe only if everything that has to be proved, then there is lot of stand for Aryans Being jus a Myth.

Answer 5

Aryan Invasion is not a theory but a historical fact which is not digested by the peoples likes of you-the Hindu zealots. Because if you accept this truth then most of the People of Northern India are Aryans, who like other Invaders have looted, plundered and driven out the original inhabitants of the Ganges plains. You and the likes of you will never accept this historical fact because if you do then your Lords Ram & Krishna (if they are a part of history and not mere mythology) are also from the same Aryan race. But then History cannot be just wished away, mind you.
And if there is "an abundance of evidence to refute it", pray then what is stopping you from presenting it. You are part of the Indian clan which has decided to repeat a lie thousand times till it is accepted as the truth. You seriously need to get your facts right before commenting on "half decent educational background" of other people.
I take this oppotunity again to invite you to the real truth. May Allah guide you. Ameen.
As the question is repeated, so is my answer.

Answer 6

You are 100% correct. Arya invasion never happend and westners made this theory to divide India into South and North (They are successful also to a big extent. See all madrasi hating hindi and north indians), and to cover up their own invasions

(This Ravishing above is a hindu hater. He is a pakistani posing as a girl and writing non-sense about hinduism.)

Answer 7

Aryans' invasion is an obvious truth, supported by sufficient historical and archaeological evidence. It is not a lie. 99+% Indians too do not suspect it.

A few, influenced by western culture and religion, have been inventing new theories every day (or hour) about Hindustan and Hinduism, to suit their imaginations and created ideas. They need to study and learn the true Hinduism, its culture, tradition, customs, etc. in its original shape, instead of trying to adulterate with their evil additions, deletions, alterations, modifications and self serving commentaries.

Answer 8

If your question is too long, the answers are likely to be minimal

What difference does this make?

Where is your peace now?

The British are gone...thats history

Answer 9

Power to the Hindu!

Answer 10

Surely Aryans are Gypsy......! Dravidans are original indians...!