Does God think Jews are above the Law? Why does He permit the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands?

Question

Why does God permit the U.N. to consistently and overwhelmingly vote (150-2) against the illegal occupation of the West Bank, the Golan Heights, and Jerusalem with the United States and Israel voting against it every year since 1967?

Answer 1

I think Ahmed Deedat explains it best in this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnkOvgMxvRI

Answer 2

How much longer will this mouthbreather continue to make false and insulting claims? What motivates this person?

There is no illegal occupation.

The Palestinians were only invented as a people in 1965.

The chairman of the Syrian Delegation at the Paris Peace Conference in February 1919 stated:
"The only Arab domination since the Conquest in 635 hardly lasted, as such, 22 years".

This declaration by an Arab politician was made before 1967, as he had not the slightest knowledge of the existence of any Palestinian people. How and when did they change their mind and decided that such people existed?

When the State of Israel was reborn in 1948, the "Palestinians" did not exist yet, the Arabs had still not discovered that "ancient" people. They were too busy with the purpose of annihilating the new Sovereign State and did not intend to create any Palestinian entity, but only to distribute the land among the already existing Arab states. They were defeated. They attempted again to destroy Israel in 1967, and were humiliated in only six days, in which they lost the lands that they had usurped in 1948. In those 19 years of Arab occupation of Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip, neither Jordan nor Egypt suggested to create a "Palestinian" state, since the still non-existing Palestinians would have never claimed their alleged right to have their own state... Paradoxically, during the British Mandate, it was not any Arab group but the Jews that were known as "Palestinians"!

What other Arabs declared after the Six-Day War:

"There are no differences between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. We are all part of one nation. It is only for political reasons that we carefully underline our Palestinian identity... yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity serves only tactical purposes. The founding of a Palestinian state is a new tool in the continuing battle against Israel".

- Zuhair Muhsin, military commander of the PLO and member of the PLO Executive Council -

Answer 3

There are no Israeli settlements or military bases in the Gaza strip since September 2005. The Gaza strip is controlled by the Palestinian self-rule.

Golan Heights is already handed back to Syria in June 2000.

The west bank does have IDF troops to protect the Jewish population. The west bank's status will be determined when Hamas gets it in their thick skulls "Israel does not need to be wipe off the map."

Jerusalem was supposed to be a open city. This was part of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181. It gave separate homelands for both Israeli and Palestinian. The Arabs world rejected this plan and cause this war we have been seeing all these years. They lost and most of Jerusalem. East Jerusalem will be determined when Hamas wakes up from their pipe dream. East Jerusalem has an Arab mayor elected by the Arabs living in the city.

Answer 4

The Palestinians: No, they are not any ancient people, but claim to be. They were born in a single day, after a war that lasted six days in 1967.

If they were true Canaanites, they would speak Hebrew and demand from Syria to give them back their occupied homeland in Lebanon, but they are not. If they were Philistines, they would claim back the Isle of Crete from Greece and would recognize that they have nothing to do with the Land of Israel, and would ask excuses to Israel for having stolen the Ark of the Covenant.


.

Answer 5

"what form of regulation college did you graduate from the lawless regulation college perhaps." Hmm, would I ask you for you to describe the way you're such an expert in regulation? permit me ask you fairly bluntly, are you asserting that that's an unlawful occupation considering that's Palestinian land? if so, how does one classify "Palestinian land"? the way I see it, that may purely recommend 2 possibilities: - inner maximum land: The land is privately owned by way of Palestinians - Public land: The land belongs to 3 variety of national or distant places entity it fairly is Palestinian. Now as to the former, that's not actual neither is it often what human beings recommend whilst they say "Palestinian land". particularly, you (and others) are pertaining to the latter. That being the case, what national entity exists or has existed that makes it "Palestinian land"? considering that Palestine became into on no account an self sufficient state, the respond is: there is not any national entity that existed. in case you prefer to argue in any different case, you besides would would desire to be arranged to agree that Jordan being interior the West financial employer became into an occupation. and whether you went forward and agreed with that, you may nonetheless would desire to describe why there became into no "liberation circulate" against Jordan and why no person calls it an occupation. As on your honestly question, that's an entire farce. you realize o.k. that Israel has elected leaders who've engaged in peace talks with the Palestinians and that the objective of those peace talks, would desire to they have succeeded, might bring about a "2 state answer". yet i think of the commonly used Israeli voter, whether he be left or dazzling wing, is familiar with o.k. that the survival of Israel comes first and for that reason is careful of what a Palestinian state would entail given the certainty on the floor. gypsy cat: I wasn't conscious that Yigal Amir, Rabin's murderer, who hails from Hertzaliah (that's close to Tel Aviv, in case you probably did no longer understand and that's nowhere close to the West financial employer), became right into a "settler". And the final PMs to barter with the Palestinians have been Barak and Netanyahu (particular, he did negotiate, that dazzling wing enthusiast!) and so some distance as i will tell, they look alive and nicely. Sharon, BTW, additionally did an enormously debatable project by way of retreating from Gaza (incomes the ire of the "settlers") yet he's in a coma via his own awful nutrition recurring (ideal to his obesity which deliver approximately his destructive wellbeing) and not an assassination attempt.

Answer 6

Palestine and Israel had the best relations until 67 when Israel was assaulted without reason or provocation, simple invaded to accomplish with a prophecy of Koran.

Since then they had taken the top of the mountains surrounding Israel and I do support them...check here and tell me if you will trust the top of your mountains around your civil cities by people like this.

http://uk.360.yahoo.com/my_profile-EiWSW3w_cqGWq250FO3Fd5WUwvIJRg--;_ylt=Aok8s5jplGfJr0TSOW3iNa48FOJ3?cq=1

Don't think as Muslim, then as a Muslim and then as a Muslim. you should have freedom of conscience and as a human being to know what it is good or bad...and this just make people physically sick.

Israel was there 2 thousand years before Jesus and is there 2 thousand years after, it doesn't matter what Koran says, is another failure of Koran, simple.

Answer 7

In the bible, God gave that land to the Jews. Muslims know this and teach that part of the torah, yet ignore it at the same time for obvious reasons. It was prophecied that the Jews would return.

Answer 8

No He does not.The Laws were given 1st to the Jews long before the Gentiles

Answer 9

. Another idiotic rant from this guy. Report as objectionable speech and move on.

Answer 10

They LEFT. You leave your land for a thousand years, you give up ownership. Why should the Israelis give back what those people willingly left?