which one things they are more like bread ,that has come down from heaven,for the people?
2007-05-12 23:32:12 · 8 answers · asked by freepress 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
so far hillary is in the lead,a,no-1 for weath distrubution,she could be in line for a new enco baised peoples car ,i think....
2007-05-12 23:46:29 · update #1
YOU , YOU , YOU . NO ONE CAN TAKE YOUR PLACE , SO DON'T BE SO MODEST. MY , MY YOU LOOK SO DASHING IN YOUR SUIT. WISH I COULD LOOK THE SAME. HOW DO YOU DO IT? YOU ARE THE GREATEST.
2007-05-12 23:37:25 · answer #1 · answered by 10-T3 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
specific, universal, I say something like this, and get no responses. Sageandscholar, lawgirl have replied properly. the economic definition of socialism is that the government owns the production and distribution of things and centers. of course, Obama is *no longer* doing the above. he's making lettuce, glasses, telephones, coffee, in spite of. The economic equipment is in many times private palms. Now, that's authentic that he desires to subsidize scientific well-being insurance. ok, it truly is one element that maximum countries do and we don't call them 'socialist'. There are some temporary issues, like automobiles and banks, yet it truly is to *help* capitalism in the process the extensive recession we've. it is likewise authentic that Obama desires to spend greater on well-being, study, training, infrastructure, etc. yet it truly is no longer socialism the two. He desires to spend greater on the undesirable, yet is that socialism? evaluate the Roman Empire used to many times grant the undesirable with bread. Social spending on the undesirable has been with us ever for the reason that government began. what's greater ridiculous is that Obama purely desires to tax us approximately the place we've been under Carter. it truly is, he desires to develop the perfect fee 3 proportion factors. All his tax will develop we've had earlier, and the economic equipment became doing splendidly. the perfect fee became 70% only earlier Reagan. If that makes us a 'Socialist united states' then we've been Socialist united states for the reason that 1940's. some people argue that any quantity of government interior the non-public sector is 'socialist'. yet to me it truly is only stupid. The founders themselves placed a placed up workplace and Patent regulation interior the form. Are the founders 'Socialist'? of direction no longer. Neither are we (whether are government has grown lots for the reason that them, the enormous majority of intake is private sector products).
2016-12-17 11:21:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both will ruin this country.
neither understand capitalism
both will collect $$ with promises of redistribution to the "poor" or minorities or the essential work that need to be done to eliminate a climate of have/have nots..
it will all be a necessity... as its for "the children who need our help"
2007-05-12 23:59:43 · answer #3 · answered by cyansure 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
85% of the entire democrat party are commie kooks, sure they want to help people, or so they claim, but to destroy their own country in the process can only be classified as insanity... Capitalism has held this country together for more than 200 yrs, sure it's not perfect, but it sure as hell is better than communism, of which if anyone recalls their history lessons, clearly depicts communist governments as total failures, and lets not overlook the fact that every US politician past to present achieved their wealth, power, and success due to Capitalism, so that makes most democrats hypocrites, as well as nut cases...
2007-05-13 00:03:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Obamma is a dreamer,Hilly is a flat out Nightmare.
2007-05-12 23:58:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
hillary truely feels that redistribution of wealth is healthy and legal. take from the haves and give to the have nots. it only makes the have nots lazy, and the rich less inclined to make money that will be stolen from them
2007-05-12 23:42:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
compare their platforms and make comparison and contrast with the social program of a socialist ideology like earlier Russia .
2007-05-12 23:37:57 · answer #7 · answered by wilma m 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Hillery has always stood up for kids, education, health care, and humanity.
Don't be afraid of a girl.
besides, i thought neos were afaid of those terriost ....behind the tree!!!...in your backyard!! LOL
2007-05-12 23:49:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 8⤋