2007-05-12 16:08:51 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
They both suck.
2007-05-12 16:09:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 0⤋
they are both major tools.
HAHA!!!
or they run great when you first get em' but then they start to become unreliable.
they have a tendency to sputter every once in a while.
they both say they'll are do a good job, but we know the truth.
oh yeah, and they both suck.... HAHA didn't think i'd say it did you? it's a pretty popular answer. hehehe
2007-05-12 16:25:13 · answer #2 · answered by Guitar_chick 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They both are in the same position as a former noun by the name of Hoover.
2007-05-12 16:13:05 · answer #3 · answered by Theodore 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The vacuum cleaner can still run.
2007-05-12 16:11:06 · answer #4 · answered by Eric 2 · 9⤊ 0⤋
They both suck and are full of crap. Not to mention the fact they both break down pretty often.
2007-05-12 16:21:30 · answer #5 · answered by Danagasta 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
1. they both suck. 2. they are both vacuums (empty) inside 3. they are noisy.
2007-05-12 16:20:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dirtbags?
2007-05-12 16:12:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
They're both loud & attracts all the dirty, foul things
2007-05-12 16:11:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if i compare him to mine ,their both useless ,neither one can get the job done ,to much mone was invested in both .
only diference is George W. sux and my vacume don't
2007-05-12 16:18:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Both suck(obvious answer), are annoying, and are from TX. LOL?
2007-05-12 16:18:43 · answer #10 · answered by your wonderwall 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
they both suck and i thank you for that one best question on here i wish that i could give you best question but i will give a star hehehe
2007-05-12 16:14:31 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋