I think there are more stars, because there a billions in view, maybe ssome planets have been undiscovered, but im pretty sure stars are more easily made than planets.
2007-05-12 15:44:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by LikeItorNot 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
YES! AND NO!
Kidding aisde, we really don't know!
The universe is full of stars, arranged in enormous groups called galaxies. Our Sun is one star among 100 billion in the Milky Way Galaxy. And there are about 100 billion galaxies in the universe, each with a comparable number of stars.
With some simple math, we can figure out the total number of stars in the universe:
(100 billion stars/galaxy) x (100 billion galaxies) = (100 x 10^9) x (100 x 10^9) = 10^22 stars
How many is that? The number of stars in the universe is more than the number of grains of sand on all the beaches of the entire Earth! More stars than there are grains of sand!
Only in the last few years have astronomers had the technology with which to discover planets around nearby stars. It does seem that most stars do have planets - although those planetary systems do not closely resemble our own solar system.
We can only barely tell that these other planets exist, we do not yet have the technology to determine if any life exists on these planets. So far no life has been discovered on any other planet but when you ponder on the number of stars that there are, it seems inevitable that there will be life on other planets.
2007-05-12 15:44:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Curiosity 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
We don't have enough information to give a definitive answer, because astronomers are better at finding very large planets than smaller ones. Basically, if the average number of planets orbiting each star is greater than one, then there are more planets than stars. If the average is less than one, then there are instead more stars. The Sun has eight planets. If every star had eight planets around it, there would be eight times as many planets as stars. If many stars out there have planets the size of Mars or Mercury orbiting them, we don't yet have the tools that would let us observe them. As a result, we only know about very large planets orbiting stars, and it seems like a decent percentage of stars do have such planets. I think there are more planets than stars, personally, but it's just a hunch.
2007-05-12 15:44:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by DavidK93 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry, I believe you are incorrect.
Take the Milky Way Galaxy, for example. On a clear night,
with the unaided eye, almost everything you see is within the Milky Way Galaxy. A few planets might be seen and identified, but there are 200 Billion + stars (just like our Sun) in the Milky Way Galaxy. Each of those stars can have from 0 to 10 (or more) planets with their associated moons orbiting around them. So there are far more planets than stars out there.
The problem is that we cannot see all of those planets. Their suns blind us when we look at them using high power optical equipment. Planets do not "shine", only stars do that. So, it is similar to looking into a car's headlights at night. The headlights blind you and you are unable to see anything around the car, or behind the headlights of the car for that reason.
Now, beyond our Milky Way Galaxy there are tens of thousands of other galaxies. Each one of those could have billions of stars in them. And, you might have guessed it, each of those stars can have from 0 to 10 (or more) planets with their associated moons orbiting around them also.
That is lots and lots of stars and an even larger number of planets.
Regards,
Zah
2007-05-12 16:02:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by zahbudar 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here is something way more fascinating.>
There are more stars in the universe than every single grain of sand on Earth and Mars)? Ok, picture a gallon of sand, that right there is alot of stars. Now picture the planet earth, now earth and mars combined. Yea I know it keeps you quietly thinking for about a minute or two.
2007-05-16 15:13:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
At 3am in direction of the south it would surely have been Jupiter it truly is presently shining at magnitude -2.sixty 5 on the Capriconus/Aquarius border. This makes it the fourth brightest merchandise interior the sky after the sunlight, Moon and Venus. Venus is only growing to be at 3am which ability of direction it would be lots extra in direction of the East. on the element of Jupiter (approximately 2/3 of a level north west as we examine out it) is the planet Neptune. you will pick binoculars to work out that although.
2016-12-17 11:09:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would assume there would be more stars since the dust that forms into palnets have had to been made from a star. Then again, one star could make many, many planets.
2007-05-12 17:02:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ryan B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think some of the things we think are stars are really planets.
2007-05-12 15:44:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Katrocious 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
actualy stars are suns and every sun should have a few planets around it so there should b more planets then stars
2007-05-12 16:13:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That there are more planets. We have 9 (8 if you don't count Pluto).
2007-05-12 15:44:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Joe S 6
·
0⤊
0⤋