is 28 weeks later a good movie?is it better than 28 days later?

Answer 1

I just saw it only a few minutes ago. It's really good, scary and gory and... *spoiler below!*







No happy ending with this one. At least I think so? The ending is rather ambiguous. Anyway, it's really good. Is it better than "28 Days Later"? Hmmm, could be. I only say "Days" once, a couple of years ago, so of course "Weeks" is much fresher in my mind. Go see it! :-)

Answer 2

I even have seen 28 days later and it became right into a disapointment. and a sturdy horror action picture could be something like cabin fever. its some team of 20 3 hundred and sixty 5 days olds that pass out to a cabin in the woods and the get a bad ailment from eating the water and unwell pass away it at that. so it is as much as u if u desire to confirm it.

Answer 3

I thought it was good. I can't really say if it's better than the first one because it's been a while since I've seen it, but I really enjoyed watching this one. It had a lot of action and it was pretty freaky during some parts (but I won't ruin it for you if you go see it). You kind of get attached to the characters, and they are all pretty well developed I think. It's worth seeing in the movies.

Answer 4

there were a lot of "boy that was a stupid thing to do" moments in this movie--and i guess movies like this actually need some of these to move the plot forward. but there were too many of them for me.

but aside from that, this is one of the grittiest and surprising movies i've seen in awhile. who makes it in to the body count is one of the things that kept surprising me. i highly recommend it to action fans because of some really great scenes and sequences.

but don't go to see it expecting a lot of logic from some of the characters.

Answer 5

One way to find out is to go see it yourself. I thought it was a great movie. The whole thing was just some messed up situation to be in, there's no escaping the 'rage' virus.