English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

reasonings for why or why not

2007-05-12 12:07:01 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

19 answers

yes he should have. every crime that Pres. Nixon was accused of Pres. Clinton committed. he was brought up on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. at the time of Pres Clinton trail there were like 10 people in jail for comminting the same crime.

2007-05-12 12:36:59 · answer #1 · answered by rap1361 6 · 1 2

NO he was not impeached. The House brought impeachment charges on 2 counts and voted to impeach him, but the Senate aquited him on both counts, therefore he was not impeached. To be impeached both sides of Congress have to vote for impeachment. The House went on a witch hunt and spent over 60 million dollars of taxpayers money to try to get him out and as they and all the rest of the country knew at that time and still do today the Reps screwed the country even when Clinton was doing well for the country. Which of course everyone knows that after the left office it took less than a year to put the country in a deficit situation once again.

2016-03-15 22:35:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This Site Might Help You.

RE:
Should Bill Clinton have been impeached?
reasonings for why or why not

2015-08-18 09:31:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/awFOZ

Yes. Bill Clinton was the second US president to be impeached. The other was Andrew Johnson.

2016-04-10 11:53:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bill Clinton was impeached,.....he was found not guilty, by the U.S. Senate, but that trial was an impeachment,.....some people think an impeachment is a removal from office, but an impeachment is the trial held in the senate,.....now, Dick Nixon, he resigned before an impeachment vote,.....

2007-05-12 13:30:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Hey there,
I downloaded Supreme Commander 2 for free here: http://bit.ly/1rlKT2S

it's a perfectly working link!
In Supreme Commander, you are involved in a planetary conflict on a huge scale.
It's amazing.

2014-09-19 14:26:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No. He was stupid to lie.
What he did was lie about a sexual act. He did not lie about anything to ruin his job performance. It was a sleezy move on the part of the prosecution. They wanted a witch hunt and they got one.

The inquisition did more to damage his ability to do his job at an enormous cost to the taxpayers.

NO president should be subjected to a trial until AFTER his term of office is over--with the exception of misconduct involving performance of his position.

2007-05-12 16:19:14 · answer #7 · answered by M☺lly, RN 6 · 0 2

Bill Clinton lied under oath to Congress about some questionable land deals and a sexual dalliance between two consenting adults.
Republicans spent a year - and hundred of millions of taxpayers' hard-earned dollars - to impeach Clinton.

George W. Bush lied to Congress and the American people about 'weapons of mass destruction' as a means of allowing him to unconstitutionally and illegally attack another sovereign nation that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the U.S.A.
George W. Bush - as Commander-In-Chief condoned the torture and abuse of 'detainees' in secret CIA prisons, in direct violation of the rules of the Geneva Convention, one of the most important and vital international agreements ever to be signed by so many participating nations as a means of minimizing such abuse.
George W. Bush has turned America into a virtual police state wherein citizens are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
George W. Bush has ignored the U.S. Constitution as he willfully and blatantly takes our laws into his own hands.
George W. Bush has never admitted to the American people that his multi-trillion-dollar war is all because of a personal vendetta his family had against Saddam Hussein and because Dick Cheney's business associates want all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands, and the giant U.S. military-industrial complex needed another 'war' to boost its sagging profits.
George W. Bush had never acknowledged that this 'war' is ALL about OIL and WAR PROFITEERING.
George W. Bush reckless mismanagement and insane foreign policies has tarnished America's reputation as a global leader and world peacekeeper.
George W. Bush's inept economic policies will result in the worst economic depression in this nation's history shortly after he leaves office.
George W. Bush has left American taxpayers TRILLIONS of dollars in debt, a debt that will not be paid off for generations to come.
Finally, George W. Bush's insipid 'war' in Iraq has resulted in 675,000 Iraq deaths and the deaths of 3,300 U.S. soldiers, for which our Commander-In-Chief has never accepted responsibility, nor has he been held accountable for such mass murder. That puts him in the company of Joseph Stalin, Adolph Hitler, Idi Amin, and Saddam Hussein as among the worst terrorists in the past 75 years.

Now, WHO do YOU think should be impeached??
-RKO- 05/12/07

2007-05-12 12:26:50 · answer #8 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 1 4

No. I think if we re-evaluated the sex lives of most politicians through the centuries, 90% had similar incidents, 9% were impotent, and 1% were faithful. Being bought and sold by corporations . . . . well, if that were examined, I don't know where I would have come out on Clinton, but I know where I'd come out on Bush for war-profiteering. I really think the sex lives of politicians is irrelevant to our world and to history.

2007-05-12 12:16:03 · answer #9 · answered by whisper2roar 3 · 3 5

Yes, he lied under oath to tell the truth! He was a lawyer?

2007-05-12 15:25:15 · answer #10 · answered by geegee 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers