If a liberal is against the war, all the cons call them a terrorist supporter and give the link for the ......

Question

media jihad, doesn't this make the cons just as guilty by giving the terrorists the divided America they so dearly desire? Are they not guilty of terrorist support if they play a part in the division that the terrorists are trying to create in America?

Answer 1

I think the terrorists would be much happier with a united, pro-Islamist America than with one divided between patriots and traitors. They'd still have plenty of other cultures to attack after the US joins the Ummah, afterall, and the nukes to do a proper job of it, to boot.

So, yes, while both sides are 'guilty' of creating a division in the US, that the 'terrorists want,' the terrorists would be much happier if that division were resolved by conservatives going liberal than the other way around. Since the one means, at worst, a US that refrains from anything more effectual than UN resolutions in oppossing them, while the other would mean escalating warfare against them.

I don't think they really want a division of society, though - it's a useful stop-gap, in that it weakens the US until they become strong enough to conquer it (something that may be generations away), and it could well paralyze the US with isolationism, giving them freer reign to operate globally. What they really want is to destroy thier enemies - the Kufar, the non-Muslims of the world who won't submit. While conservatives may see your 'lack of patriotism' as betraying an alliance with the terrorists, the terrorists actually see you as every bit as much the 'enemy' as the conservatives. For slightly different reasons - the conservatives are more willing to fight, while you stake out even more un-islamic moral ground than they do.

Answer 2

Well I do know the Iraq war has done the terrorists (remember those people who attacked us?) a huge favor by removing their secular enemy Saddam from power and being able to use the Iraq war as a massive recruiting tool. So I ask who really supports the terrorists ?

Answer 3

It's the cons that have all the terrorist websites save on their computer. It's got to make one wonder why they are surfing terrorist websites all the time.

Answer 4

because of the fact the vote required a great-majority of two-thirds because of the approach that the Democrats utilized in crafting the bill. nevertheless, some GOP contributors did vote for the bill.. i think that that became an intentional pass so as that Congressman Weiner might desire to hone his performing skills and the Democrats might desire to blame Republicans for its failure to bypass..

Answer 5

Let me see if I get this straight. You want the conservatives to lay down and give in to *everything* that the liberals want? Even when those liberals are giving aid, comfort, and encouragement to an enemy that wants to totally subjugate us, take away our freedoms and have us bow down to Mecca 5 times a day? Wow! That sure makes sense to me! Where do I sign up?

Answer 6

start thinking for yourself and quit listening to CNN, and the media and by all means ignore college professors and you will be on your way to true independence and critical thinking

do some independent research into the war and stop believing retired rent a generals to do you thinking

Answer 7

We certainly didn't need terrorists to divide us. We, as Americans, are not drones - we're allowed to think differently to one another, haven't you heard?

Labeling everyone "Liberal" or "Conservative" is your first mistake.

Answer 8

Absolutely not. It tells them that we aren't buying into the propaganda. That is disingenuous. I personally only post that link to the obvious terrorist sympathizers.

Answer 9

Well, I welcome division. I have nothing in common with pro-abortion leftist hypocrites or warmongering neocons.

Ron Paul 2008

Answer 10

Your reasoning is too sophisticated for the Cons to fathom...