An alleged Soviet autopsy on Hitler's remains made shortly after the war claimed Hitler was monorchic, but most historians dismiss this reference as propaganda. This autopsy was only released around 1970. However, records show that he was wounded in 1916 during the Battle of the Somme, and some sources describe his injury as a wound to the groin. Hitler's World War I company commander has said that a VD exam found that Hitler had only one testicle. Robert G.L. Waite in his book The Psychopathic God: Adolf Hitler (1978) accepts the accuracy of this evidence:
Since the matter is of considerable importance to the psychological development of Hitler from infancy onward, let us pause here and come to grips with the problem of the Fuehrer's testicles. It can now be affirmed that the British Tommies were right all along in the first line of their version of the Colonel Bogey March, they were although manifestly mistaken in the last—that is to say, unless Goebbels' 6 children were the progeny of adoption, paternal surrogacy or some hitherto unconsidered, presumably unpalatable "Gott mit uns" form of divine intervention.
The autopsy performed by the Red Army pathologists on Hitler's body... [produced clear] findings:
The left testicle could not be found either in the scrotum or on the spermatic cord inside the inguinal canal, or in the small pelvis...
There was some discussion of this issue for several weeks in the letters column of the New Statesman, a British magazine in the early 1970s, although all correspondents accepted the Soviet autopsy as valid. One claimed that British intelligence had discovered that Hitler was monorchic and written the song in an attempt to drive him even further round the bend than he was already, with some elaborate theories about how they might have discovered this. Others thought that it was sheer coincidence, and one even claimed that there had been a similar song sung about Napoleon (this may not be true). One pointed out that most English speakers would not pronounce "Goebbels" correctly, they would pronounce it "Goballs", which suggests "no balls" and the rest would follow. (This correspondence came to a conclusion of sorts when one correspondent wrote a letter complaining about the conditions in which alleged illegal immigrants were being detained, adding that this was a more important issue than Hitler's balls.)
Unfortunately, the Soviet autopsy of Hitler cannot be accepted as authoritative. Hitler's death by suicide and the subsequent almost complete burning of his body would leave little for doctors to analyze — much less be able to focus on such a small body part. The autopsy is discussed in Ron Rosenbaum's book Explaining Hitler: The Search for the Origins of His Evil (1998). He concludes that it was fabricated, based on information from Hitler's doctor and recantations by the compilers of the published form of the report.
2007-05-12 11:36:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by kittenspurr2 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
One thing is for sure: medias at that time were not as reliable as they are today.
Thus I'd believe in a kind of arab phone scenario.
Something, you know, like "Young Adolf had trouble with one of his testicles during his childhood and a doctor quickly fixed that". And the story would later become: "Hitler was found dead with a bollock missing".
How could that be anyways? I've been told that Hitler exploded. He did not just died. His body parts were scattered. Where's the bollock? Where's the head? Where's the pinch? < Is that him anyway? >
A difference which i'm pretty sure made Hitler the evil character he is today, is trisomy. Because if one looks carefully at the Fuhrer's face while he yells at the German Nation (some of his exploits are still available on VHS and perhaps DVD), one will notice that he mimics the habits of a typical individual affected by trisomy 21. That alone could well explain why the Fuhrer seemed to act like no "normal" being would. Maybe Hitler was just listening to his big friends' advice, like a sort of Forrest Gump. Then maybe he was exploited, for everyone around him knew he was a servile man since his early days in the bavarian army.
That aside, the biggest mystery about Hitler remains to me: "how can a so technologically advanced and genius-producing nation like Luther's, Marx's and Einstein's could have ever listened so blindly to such a loud mouth". I think he was not even able to write. Mein Kampf was not his hand, it was (supposedly) his speech tranlslated by a decent author willing to cooperate. Consider: propaganda was very effective and common at that time, and the one used by Hitler was recognised later as successful. Germany even produced videos to tell the nation that they were triumphant in Russia, while the opposite really happened (unless we are still the ones being tricked by efficient propaganda). I view this as the true beginning of mass media we are so much aware of today. It was not only Hitler's affair --- it was socialism against ancient capitalism, and many new tricks were tested during that scorpion of an era. Even Coca-Cola successfully tried his luck after the second war to become number one drink, and we can bet that was with a purpose far beyond $$$.
2007-05-12 14:47:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Roy Nicolas 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually no reliable evidence has been presented to conclusively 'prove' that Adolf Hitler had only one testicle. Though this is not an unknown medical malady, many men have only one, or some have one perfectly developed testicle while the other is undeveloped.
People -- historians - - have a weird habit when they perceive someone to be evil they feel the need to ascribe that evil to some defect. Thus a lot of buzz went around that Adolf was some sort of sexual freak, that he had difficulty achieving intimacy with women hence World War Two and the Holocaust. There was even a biography commissioned by The Allies that spread lots of dirt about Hitler. A man was actually paid to write a booklet detailing all of Hitlers supposed defects. A whole slew of accusations' one testical, a tiny weenie, unable to satisfy women, perhaps Hitler took the female submissive position and rented his mouth & rectum to men during his years living on the streets of Vienna (in other words, homeless bashing - - - oh gee World War Two & the Holocaust would not have happened if Hitler had not been homeless for a few years).
Actually all known Hitler medical records made no reference to Hitler having any abnormalities though one document has surfaced that states that Hitler had 'one undescended testicle,' but the validity of that document has always been under dispute.
Eva Braun stayed with Hitler for years, was his secret wife, and obviouslly she had no complaints. When she did grumble to friends about Adolf she referenced his personality and made no mention of sexual problems. Since Eva had a rep for being 'fun loving,' it is quite certain that if there was anything wrong with Hitler sex wise, Eva would have said something.
Peace
2007-05-12 11:30:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by JVHawai'i 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Good evening Smoochy :) Sid Sings is a load of old pants, so it's Never Mind The Bollocks for me. Sex Pistols vs PIL - PIL The Damned vs Sex Pistols - A tough call. I'm going with The Damned. Jawbreaker vs The Clash - Most definitely The Clash.
2016-05-21 05:07:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by nicolette 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Read Norman Mailer's new book - can't remember the name. It, as other sources have, suggests that Hitler had one undescended testicle. One, two or twenty - he was still the most evil man of all.
Oh, and there is absolutely no proof whatsoever that Eva and ol' Adolph ever had sex. He really was quite creepy in addition to being a psychotic sociopath.
2007-05-12 12:50:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by 34th B.G. - USAAF 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am certain he had only one.
He acted like he was half nuts
2007-05-13 17:43:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ret. Sgt. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
gearing had 2 but very small,himler had something similar,BUT poor old goebels had no balls at all.
2007-05-12 12:03:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋