I know 1080p is 1920x1080 progressive. Does that mean 1920x1200 is better? Also, if you look at http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8260534&type=product&productCategoryId=pcmcat104900050012&id=1170289357971 (a 1920x1200 Acer monitor), they say nothing about 1080p, as opposed to the Gateway at http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Gateway-24-Widescreen-Monitor-FPD2485W/sem/rpsm/oid/166293/catOid/-12965/rpem/ccd/productDetail.do. Is it just a different way of displaying the same information, or is the Acer not progressive? What is going on here? Could you straighten this out?
2007-05-12
09:12:41
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Stupid Flanders
4
in
Computers & Internet
➔ Hardware
➔ Monitors
I just noticed the above link for the Gateway at Circuit City isn't working. Try searching (at CircuitCity.com) for Gateway FPD2485W 24" Widescreen Monitor, or at least part of that, in case you want to specifically know what I'm talking about.
2007-05-12
09:18:14 ·
update #1
By the way, I don't need an explanation for the whole pixel concept. I know that all the numbers I gave you above refer to number of pixels horizontally and vertically. My main question is: is there a difference between 1920x1200 and 1080p? Also, does just saying 1920x1200 imply that the monitor uses progressive scan, not interlaced (or does it mean that it is in face interlaced)?
2007-05-12
09:27:35 ·
update #2