YES spanky by all means..for if she disobeys shed be in violation of marital law...hahaha
2007-05-12 08:07:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by cindy 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Love and honor are a must. Obey, on the other hand can be interpreted many different ways - When it comes down to it I think the wife just needs to have & show respect for her husband. Each person has to give 100% in the marriage. The husband should love and cherish his wife, respect her and remain faithful.
2007-05-12 08:13:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by ☆Bombastic☆ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The word obey is a parent to a child term,
The word obey is a Master to his/her slave term,
The word obey is a teacher to a student term,
The word obey is a legal term for following rules and laws.
It has no place in a marriage vow...it hasn't been said in many many years because we have all grown and updated; except you. Years ago brides were SOLD to their grooms!
I believe that a bride and groom should love and honor each other....and take that word obey and use in for your DOG TRAINING!
2007-05-12 08:19:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by missellie 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, I don't. Both should vow to love, honor and respect each other. A marriage is a partnership. By including the word "obey", it's saying that one person in the marriage is a lesser person. I would never want to marry someone who felt he was superior to me.
2007-05-12 12:18:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Erin 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I will vow to honour and love my future husband but I wont be saying "Obey". I don't expect my husband to obey me, and vice versa.
2007-05-13 17:49:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Panda 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that love is born with us, and that we are born ----to love. However, anything that takes to breathe life, if not nurtured, goes 'bonsai'. Love deserves growth inside and alongside of us. We learn, even without directly being taught, how to 'grow love'-----the 'best meaningful ways'. It is called for by spontaneous situations where the 'innate' beckons the 'will' to get involved.....till the corresponding realization is inscribed in the mind and the heart. Because love isn't a thing of some stagnant water; the more it branches, the wider its reach. That's 'how' others come to track the footsteps of love manifested by us. And that is the so-called 'innate learning'.
2016-05-21 03:51:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes sweetheart.
It is a wife's duty to love, honor, and obey her husband and it should be in their wedding vow along with the promise to always make sure her husband is happy because the husband is going to be the one to support her and protect her, the least us women can do is serve our husbands.
XOXO
2007-05-12 10:24:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Yes. I think submit can be used instead of obey, though. We based our wedding vows on Eph.5:22-31, so I vowed to submit.
2007-05-12 08:11:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kaz 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Love and honor yes but obey no, women are not pets that their husband can bark orders at for them to obey them and do what they say. Thats not what marriage is about!
2007-05-12 08:07:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by wildspirit27 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yes she should and above all she should dispell all of those ugly uendoes about barking orders and the such. A good man will never bark orders to his wife. All obedience is a deep mutual respect between a man and a woman; it's about both working on the common goal of respecting each other and yes there is respect in obedience and many will see it once they get their heads out of the sand. Actually it should be an automatic. It's an ideal way to show support and respect.
2007-05-12 08:53:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Laela (Layla) 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
love and honor but not obey... if obey was added I would not get married
2007-05-12 08:13:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by Lindsey G 5
·
1⤊
1⤋