http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070512/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq
i think this is too many, it has been too many for a very very long time!
2007-05-12 05:49:37 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well seeing we spend more money on fighting a war like this than we do taking care of our own people, I would have to say it was too high from the get go.
2007-05-12 05:54:34 · answer #1 · answered by bs b 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would say it is already too much but with all the violence in the world and even the U.S., with Jihad determination to kill Americans and all Israels, with home grown terrorists, with unsafe borders AND with the liberalism prevelent in the Country today I am concerned that we will be subjected to more and more devastating 9/11, bombings in our streets, our schools, our shopping malls, our sports arenas, our hospitals, anywhere they can do the most damage we will be safe nowhere and all sense of security for our children and ourselves will be jeopardized.
All the devastation we have observed in other countries will be on our doorstep.
How can any reasonable person really know what the solution to this dilemma is. I'm afraid we are targeted right now and our enemies are diligently planning our destruction.
2007-05-12 06:02:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No price is too high for us to stay free. You and your liberal friends do not understand the threat we are facing because you are too busy at the gay bars and abortion clinics to see past your own nose.
Go read the koran and see what it teaches. Then look at what terrorist muslims are doing around the world.
Wake up and smell the jihad before you star in a beheading video like the terrorists Bush is protecting you from want.
2007-05-12 06:16:39 · answer #3 · answered by mountainclass 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are going to remain in Iraq permanently and nothing anyone says will change this .
History has shown that in the past those who did not act to secure land and resources eventually struggle and are at the mercy of others .
This will not be the case with oil and we will prevail in this goal .
2007-05-12 06:03:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Instead of looking to make a reasonable resolve to the conflict, why do people always see dollars and bodies.
This sees to be a typical argument made. Rather than think of a solution, liberals just want to argue.
2007-05-12 05:59:18 · answer #5 · answered by Colonel 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
One! One death in Iraq was too many! And its not getting better, its getting worse. 60,000+ dead Iraqi civilians!!! 3000+ American soldiers killed!!! Thats just disgusting and horrible in every way.
Support Sen. Mike Gravel, running for President. He is the only one who has my full trust that he will get us out of Iraq immediately upon arrival in the White House.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gMlHv2lDqA (Highlights of Sen. Gravel at the first Democratic debate)
www.Gravel2008.us (His campaign website)
2007-05-12 05:59:14 · answer #6 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Half a trillion $$ so far, 3375 troops killed, at least 600 contractors killed, and 60,000 Iraqi civilians.
2007-05-12 05:55:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
$1 in money and one in body count is far too much to spend on a war we should never have been in.
2007-05-12 07:32:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Americans don't care about body counts. Or they wouldn't trim their fetuses like toenails.
It's about being screwed by corrupt politicians that Americans don't like.
2007-05-12 05:59:24 · answer #9 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
50,000 Iraqi al-qaeda members in the beginning of the war... 500,000 Iraqis dead now. I think that number is slightly high don't you?
2007-05-12 05:53:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋