English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

I believe it is a part of string theory that when you break down atoms to the smallest size their are many different dimensions that arent oticed on a larger scale. Our reality deals with up down forward backward but on a molecular level there is many different way to move through space one of those being time.

2007-05-12 03:57:25 · answer #1 · answered by kyle k 2 · 0 0

Time is a man made linear measure that tracks the earth's progress around the sun. We can not go backwards or forwards as we are occupying a et space on the perverbial ruler that measures time. However there appears to be times when history repeats itself. This repeating of similar sitations makes time to appear to be an inward moving sprial (as the rate at which time appears to repeat itself is accelerating). For example, let us look at the 2,000 year history of the Roman Empire, first the citizens believed in Rome and worked hard to obtain the dream that was Rome. Over the course of their roughly 2,000 year history they became collectively lazy resulting in the demise of the empire. History seems to be repeating that same process here in the United States but a much faster rate. Thus the situations are similar but not exactly the same.

Taking a very different approach, the tiny vibrations referred to in String Theory that hold the universe together and allow life to happen may also be occuring on a much larger scale allowing for the vibrations to push the universe and/or time in one direction then swing back in the opposite direction creating deja vous scenarios and causing history to repeat itself.

2007-05-18 12:12:32 · answer #2 · answered by Rascal 1 · 0 0

String Theory

2007-05-16 23:36:46 · answer #3 · answered by hilltopobservatory 3 · 0 0

String theory...(well, sort of). It proposes an infinite number of parallel universes could exist starting from any one given point in space and time....so there could be an infinite number of versions of me answering this question somewhere out there. We just only get to experience ONE at a time....it just proposes the existence of others.

2007-05-12 10:56:05 · answer #4 · answered by bradxschuman 6 · 1 0

I have never heard of any theory that supports that and consider realty, if you had to make a choice at a certain point in time, that option would give you the chance to make two choices. Consider the absurdity of that.

2007-05-12 11:03:30 · answer #5 · answered by Gene 7 · 0 0

This is not possible. Time is unidirectional and static in the sense that it is always NOW. NOW is always sandwiched between the event that just ended and the one just beginning as the past flows into the future.

2007-05-19 12:00:36 · answer #6 · answered by johnandeileen2000 7 · 0 0

Memory.

2007-05-19 01:14:42 · answer #7 · answered by Gary B 3 · 0 0

The string theory.

THE SOUTH WILL RISE AGAIN!

2007-05-12 11:49:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers