Should congress be fighting the President about funding or give him what he wants?

Answer 1

We elected this Congress to exercise some control over this president, it is their duty to try every way they can to do so. The troops are not being cut off and they have better equipment now than they did when first sent over there underequipped.

I think that the President should stop throwing a tantrum against Congress and just let them do their job - hows about that option? Congress funded the troops, Bush just doesn't likethe idea of not having it all his way.

Answer 2

The whole crowd acts like little kids fighting in the sandbox.

I understand the problem congress has trying to pass a bill that the dictatorial president says he will veto before he even knows what is in it.
Right now, the Pentagon says there is enough funding to last until July. So congress has a little more time to try to get something accomplished that the majority of Americans want, some sort of plan to get through with Iraq.

They do NOT need to give Bush another blank check, especially with the millions and millions that cannot be accounted for that he has already spent. The pentagon says right now, the military cannot account for 25% of what it has spent. Where does the missing money go????

Answer 3

You had the terrific suited occasion however the incorrect end. whilst the Congress sponsored out of the "contract with usa" and the federal shutdown, it wasn't by fact the President had the persons at the back of him. It grow to be by fact Congress grow to be the final one to realize this in this, so consequently they could have been to close down the government and not the President. the comparable ingredient will take place here. If the Congress attaches a timeline to investment and the President vetoes it, the President will blame Congress for no longer offering sufficient investment for the troops and accuse Congress of enjoying politics with the priority. he will win that argument, by fact professional or anti-conflict, human beings do no longer opt to verify the troops bypass without desirable investment.

Answer 4

Constitutionally Congress can do only 2 things... they can refuse to fund the war at all, or they can provide funds for the troops. Anything else is political pandering and posturing and is hurtful to the country in time of war.

Answer 5

The President apatite is madly active, if the Congress gives him what he wants he will ask again, I think for the sake of Nation unity Congress should come to a compromise.

Answer 6

I read an article in the paper yesterday about a training facility we funded in Jordan. We paid the Jordanian government to train Iraqi security forces. The problem is that after Jordan trained tens of thousands of men, there is no record of who these men were, where they came from, or where they went afterward.
The outcome is that tens of thousands of men, some of who may very well have been known terrorists, have been trained on our procedure for searching homes for weapons and cars for bombs.
Do we want to continue to fund a war in which we may also be training the enemy on how to fight us?
This war is the biggest fiasco in US history. It's time to stop throwing good money after bad.

Answer 7

I think that Congress and the President need to sit down and come up with a plan to get Iraq on it's own two feet and get us out of there. It has to be a plan that is actually feasible and then set forth in implementing it. Then they need to do whatever needs to be done to make it happen. If more money is needed then give it. If more troops are needed then give it. Whatever it takes, give it. We need to fix this mess and then get out of there.

Answer 8

I agree with citizenjane's initial statement they the group is acting like kids. I believe however that Bush's veto was a good measure. This bill was bogus and full of pork. I am disturbed that Congress had to fill it as such just to get the votes of their constituents. To the American voter who unserstands and is not bamboozled by Congress's claims that they are "supporting" the troops by bringing them home, filling this bill with pork just to get votes shows it's a bad idea to begin with. Support the troops. Give them what they need.

Answer 9

Yes congress should give the President and our troops unlimited support.

Answer 10

George Walker Bush is like the school bully who never grew up as he threatens like a ten year old kid if he doesn't get his way. This pampered and spoilt Ivy League Punk should have never have even been allowed to run for President. He has proven himself to be incompetent and illiterate and should be removed from power for the moron that he is though he is just a puppet for VP Dickless Cheney and his thugs in his Administration.