English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-12 00:26:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet Other - Computers

8 answers

I currently own and hate my emaching. I have never had networking and virus issues like I do on my emachine. I would recommend spending a little extra for a better quality PC. I would go with Dell.

2007-05-12 00:34:07 · answer #1 · answered by Scott B 7 · 1 0

As a previous user of a EMachine, I had good luck with mine. I had no incompatibilities with drivers and as long as I stayed within the boundaries of what the machine was capable of doing, it worked fine. If you are unsure, talk to an expert and let them know what you are planning on using the computer for, if it is just for e-mailing, IMing and stuff, you don't need to spend a lot of money, but if you are doing graphics designs, you may want to consider options such as more RAM, Video cards, etc...

Computer have a expected lifespan (being able to keep up with software, OS, etc...) of about 2-3 years so also take that into consideration when deciding on how much to spend.

2007-05-12 02:30:03 · answer #2 · answered by kevin_harms 2 · 1 0

could ?
I think there alright machines best are the ones you build yourself . But I would go for a dell or hp not a big fan of gateway or emachine . Choice is in the style and if you like it . Good Luck on your choices

2007-05-12 00:30:18 · answer #3 · answered by Stang 3 · 1 0

From my experience they are fine computers. One has to realize that it's not the "name brand" that makes a PC good or bad. It's what's inside. BTW, E machines are owned by Gateway. I use mine for everything, including : recording, mixing (24+ tracks) video work and more. No problems at all.

2007-05-12 02:16:19 · answer #4 · answered by John s 4 · 1 0

eMachines was a maker of low-cost home PCs based in Irvine, California. It employed about 135 employees and sold between 1 and 2 million computers per year, before its purchase on January 30, 2004, by rival Gateway Computers.

HISTORY
The company appeared in September 1998 as a joint venture between Korean monitor maker KDS and Korean computer manufacturer TriGem, announcing models at price points of $399, $499, and $599, all without a monitor. At the time, few PCs sold for less than $699, and $999 was a more common price point for entry-level PCs. The first units shipped in November of the same year. eMachines PCs quickly became common in retail stores and touched off a ruinous price war involving Compaq, HP, IBM, and Packard Bell. eMachines PCs were frequently offered with large rebates, provided the consumer signed a long-term contract with an internet service provider, driving down the price further.

By early 2000, eMachines was the fifth-largest seller of PCs, in terms of volume, in the world, and had driven Packard Bell and IBM, as well as several smaller value-oriented vendors, from the US retail market.

In March 2000, hoping to further cash in on the dot-com boom, eMachines filed an Initial Public Offering with its share price set at $9. But with thin profit margins and declining sales due to a souring economy, the company quickly started losing money and received a threat of being delisted by NASDAQ in late December 2000. Its stock price, which had peaked at $10, had fallen as low as 14 cents. The company went private in December 2001.

Continuing price pressure from eMachines, along with Dell's aggressive pursuit of the home computer market, contributed to the merger between HP and Compaq. At the end of 2003, eMachines was the #3 personal computer maker in the world, in terms of sales figures, behind Dell and HP.

Before the company went private in 2001, eMachines' desktop components were generally considered poor quality. However, after the private buy-out, eMachines began using decent quality, off-the-shelf components in its desktops. As a result, hardware would last longer, and individual components could be replaced with ease. Over the past few years, eMachines desktops and laptops are generally considered to have come a long way in value and reliability, offering several high-end models and plenty of value for the money in today's market.

In December 2003, eMachines released the T6000 desktop, the world's first mass-marketed AMD Athlon 64-based system. The systems were primarily sold through Best Buy stores, but were also available online. At $1,150US retail, the T6000 was more expensive than the average eMachines desktop, but was still incredibly affordable, given the specifications: AMD Athlon 64 3200+, 512MB RAM, 160GB hard drive, and a ATI Radeon 9600 graphics card. The T6000 sold well, but was forced into obscurity in 2004, as the AMD64 market quickly heated up and Intel's EM64T implementation was released in 2004. They were also the first company to sell notebooks based on the AMD Mobile Athlon 64, with the launch of its M6000 series in January of 2004.

On January 30, 2004, Gateway announced its intent to purchase eMachines for $30 million in cash and 50 million shares of stock, valuing the deal at approximately $234.5 million. Gateway still sells PCs under the eMachines name at low prices.

2007-05-12 00:29:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If you mean Good Computers, they are kinda like the low end stuff. Not neccesarily bad. If you just use a computer lightly (no gaming or encoding, editing etc..) If just for email and web surfing, some word documenting etc... then it will prolly be enough for you :)

2007-05-12 00:31:43 · answer #6 · answered by ComputerDude 3 · 1 0

Im assuming your asking if they are good pcs. Working in tech support and the abundance of calls I get with customers using them....NO. They sound cheap and almost everyone has a problem with one, no offense to anyone that has one.

2007-05-12 00:30:32 · answer #7 · answered by John K 3 · 1 0

Yes they are computers thats what my old one is.

2007-05-12 00:29:55 · answer #8 · answered by Death Girl Am 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers