As asked... if you had to pick between a (almost pure) democracy or to pick between politicians who you KNEW would vote on principle with an ethic system of 100% integrity. Which one would you choose and why?
2007-05-11 23:54:46 · 6 answers · asked by d.anconia 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As asked... if you had to pick between a (almost pure) democracy or to pick between politicians who you KNEW would vote on principle with an ethic system of 100% integrity. Which one would you choose and why?
Edit: Let me add detail. An ethical platform with 100% integrity would most closely be defined as a platform that does not contradict itself and is based on sound reasoning. At least that is my definition for this question.
2007-05-12 00:07:58 · update #1
The politician with integrity (whis is an oxymoron). In the US politicians are elected to represent the people, not to do the bidding of the people. If the majority of constituents want a law allowing marijuana, the elected officials should not be persuaded by the majority but by sound reasoning.
2007-05-12 00:00:08 · answer #1 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
definite, i think of if a spouse can no longer believe her husband, then electorate shouldn't believe that baby-kisser. In different words, he's a cheater. they could have smarts and integrity, yet their suggestions is someplace else. Why do no longer they do the suitable factor and divorce their better half and then pursue yet another adventure in the event that they do no longer look to be satisfied of their marriage.? Clinton became right into a shame...he cheapened the Oval place of work of the White abode. a minimum of we won't accuse Bush of something like that. he's definitely a famly guy.
2016-11-27 20:38:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fred Thompson.
2007-05-11 23:59:41 · answer #3 · answered by SouthernGrits 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interestingly enough – your question seems tied to Ron Paul
I do not believe in immortality of the individual, and I consider ethics to be an exclusively human concern with no superhuman authority behind it. - Albert Einstein
2007-05-12 00:39:43 · answer #4 · answered by patrsup 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It would depend on what their ethics were.
Why can't we have a president who has both for a change?
2007-05-11 23:58:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those who know right from wrong and serve in the best interest of our country.
2007-05-12 00:06:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋