Did atheists in the nineteenth century feel that the theory of spontaneous generation disproved the christian?

Question

God? you know back when they thought maggots came from meat that set out? why do the atheists on Q&A only dispute the christian God? have they never walked a path? or read more than just the bible?

Answer 1

The reason the Christian god is under fire here more than any of the others is that this part of the site is in English. Native English speakers are Americans, Brits, Canadians, Australians, and New Zealanders, all of which are historically majority Christian countries. English-speaking atheists were typically born in a majority Christian country, often to Christians themselves.

Answer 2

I think Tony is trying to slyly discredit evolution and atheists who for some reason use that theory as their sole basis for being atheists. This simply isn't true.

The seemingly channeled disputes you're referring to are mostly due to the overwhelming majority of Christian-related questions on here.

The definition of atheism is lacking a belief in God all together, so any atheist is actually lacking a belief in all Gods, not just the Christian God. So, real atheists would dispute all gods, which most do, but here you will see a slightly skewed distribution of criticism because of what I mentioned above and because of the nature of Christianity.

I've read more than just the Bible, I'm an atheist, end of story.

Answer 3

The Christian god in the Bible disproves himself with or without the help of atheists.

Atheists don't dispute the Christian god for the very fact they don't BELIEVE in him. They dispute the BELIEVERS - typically the Christians because Christianity is a major religion, the atheist members of this forum in the U.S. are outnumbered and discriminated against by the Christians and Christians arrogantly claim Christianity to be the true religion.

Answer 4

Your ignorance is showing again. Francesco Redi proved maggots would not appear in meat when flies were prevented from laying eggs in 1668. Disproving spontaneous generation of microbes took a little longer. The fact that you jump from fake science to the unrelated false statement that the Y!A atheists only dispute only the Christian God, your dishonesty is also showing. A number of the atheists here are very well versed in religious literature.

Answer 5

relatively some scientists forget this, yet once you have been to get rid of each and every of the water out of the oceans, you would be conscious that there is airborne dirt and mud below. The continents are no longer in elementary terms lilie pads floating around in pond of water. The continental glide concept in elementary terms exists because of the fact South u.s. and Africa seem to extra healthful particularly nicely to the bare eye. What they do no longer tell you is they should cut back Africa by potential of 40% whilst they placed their fashions together. you will additionally be conscious that each and every person of considered necessary u.s. is long previous from those fashions. If continents had extremely moved that a techniques over hundreds of thousands of years, there is no reason to have self belief that there could be any shape resemblance. Land hundreds that length shifting that a techniques with plenty water, airborne dirt and mud, and recycling of the land, and erosion could in all hazard no longer resemble one yet another. At on the instant's modern-day erosion expenses, the earth will erode thoroughly flat in 14 million years, and of direction would be lined by potential of water. If continental drifting has been going on as appreciably because of the fact the pangaea style shows, and for that long, this finished planet could be a water worldwide precise now. it is genuine that he continents are at present shifting aside (Atlantic) approximately as rapid as your fingernails advance. yet this has no longer something to do with proving whilst they began, the place they began, or how consistent the fee has been etc... additionally, Wegener's concept is a concept. it is not noted demonstrable certainty. relatively you are the right age to realize that each and every little thing isn't because it variety of feels. A negating concept isn't evidence against the Biblical account of the worldwide's history. in certainty, it may pan out that the thought's time-line is incorrect, and it ought to pass directly to prepare the cataclysmic events defined as going on in the time of the flood. in case you examine your Bible, you will locate that there became into so plenty better than rain inflicting all that water to cover the earth.

Answer 6

I'm confused. So... you're faulting atheists for reading more than the Bible? How's that going to help your cause?

Answer 7

Dunno how they felt. Do you know how nineteenth century christians felt and if so why would you think so.

Now, why does the theory of aerodynamics threaten you and do you ever get on airplanes?