According to Forbes, "Per capita, the United States incarcerates approximately seven times more of its citizens than most Western societies. ......'
"The effects of this extend deeply into contemporary U.S. society:
Reintegration problems. Former inmates have difficulty obtaining employment, accessing housing, acquiring educational opportunities and avoiding further criminal activity.
New federal sanctions. However, welfare policy changes in 1996 applied additional sanctions to ex-felons that make it more difficult to avoid re-offending.
Community impact. Since over half of those now in prison have been convicted for non-violent crimes, new sanctions have helped precipitate a self-sustaining downward spiral in many minority communities."
Wouldn't we all be safer & better off with sentencing & parole reforms, improvements for incarcerated mentally ill, and more rehab programs?
http://www.forbes.com/business/2007/05/09/felons-voting-rights-biz-cx_0510oxford.html
2007-05-11
17:43:05
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Jennifer
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Thanks for all serious answers.
Steven S, You must have missed the "per capita" phrase, meaning that the number of people in each country was considered when the statistic was computed.
THE FROBES ARTICAL POINTS OUT HOW THIS IS NEGATIVELY IMPACTING OUR COMMUNITIES.
I am certainly not against incarcerating those who commit crimes, but even the California prison guard union was in favor of reasonable sentencing and parole reform over a new bill that expands the prison system and adds more prison jobs.
Both Republican and Democratic leaders wanted to be seen as being tough on crime and passed a bill that temporarily patches the prison system with more beds. It promises some reform. That bill,to be paid for with borrowed money, will cost us tax payers, and our grandchildren, about $16 Billion when financing costs are included.
2007-05-12
17:37:59 ·
update #1