It is disheartening to me and anyone who is human to see pictures of dead babies.
2007-05-11 16:32:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by momof3 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
I don't think it's a 'liberal' or 'conservative' kind of thing. I believe it's a matter of personal preference. I read the question link a few minutes ago and had decided to pass over it. It was quite a sensationalistic question. (is that a word teehee). I don't know that the picture referred to is either a dead baby or a live one - could go either way as a living baby in the womb looks like that.
at any rate - I'm offended if the picture of the dead baby is displayed strictly for sensationalism. For education purposes anywhere else, I've got a pretty strong stomach
blessings :)
2007-05-11 23:40:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is not a picture of a dead baby. It is a picture of a 36/38 week old baby in its mothers womb taken with a 4 D scan.
What makes you think it is a dead baby?
Honestly people jumping to conclusions again without knowing the facts. Unusual for round here that does not happen alot does it? NOT!
Google 4D scan pictures and you will see hundreds the same. Ignorance is bliss? You must all be in nirvana......
2007-05-11 23:45:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Thinking about dead babies at all scares me. I get scared every day about the possibility (however unlikely it may be) of my son dying.
Speaking of the "right to life" crowd, there were about 4 or 5 kids, looked about "college student" age, putting on a silent demonstration outside of an Arby's restaurant down the street from my house. They were standing side by side with red tape over their mouths and holding Bibles.
2007-05-11 23:32:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Dead babies are not "liberal" or "conservative". Dead babies are dead babies.
And no, I am not offended by pictures of dead babies. Just as I am not offended by the famous picture of Nguyá»
n Ngá»c Loan executing a prisoner. I am offended by the act of killing, but not a representation of it.
2007-05-11 23:35:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gordon Freeman 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I never thought it was a picture of a dead baby. It looks more like the new GE sonogram imaging technique. It is a live fetus in utero.
But pictures of dead babies and children do disturb me, how could they not? I see every child in danger or pain as *my* child, and I ache for them.
.
2007-05-12 09:13:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I admit, I don't like corpses. But death seems to be a part of life at this point. I think that person is likely just trying to prove a point of view with their picture.
Kind of like, if JC were to own a laptop. I bet that might even offend somebody.
A lot of people are easily offended.
2007-05-11 23:36:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by CHRISTINA 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
First, the picture looks to be a new born not dead. Second, I think the problem is the name that goes with it "4Life" Third, if you support abortion and its not a human lif e why should it bother you but it if is a human life and you support it than maybe that dislike is your conscience speaking
2007-05-11 23:40:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sulfol1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Offended, no. Disturbed, yes. Well, I'm pretty much disturbed by images of dead anythings.
What bothers me (not offends, that takes a lot more) is the intention behind posting pictures like that. I'll just leave it at that.
2007-05-11 23:38:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wheather tied to the liberal or conservative mind...the idea of the death of innocent life,causes me more sadness than I could possibly communicate...especially,when it can be prevented or carried out by a simple nod of the head.
2007-05-11 23:40:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by bonsai bobby 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope that no one wants to see pictures of dead babies. I don't even like thinking about it.
God Bless.
2007-05-11 23:37:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋