If it is, then should be reported and deleted for chatting over yahoo answers is a violation?
2007-05-11 10:56:52 · 7 answers · asked by Sliceathroat 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Oh yeah!!!
You're DAMN right!!!
God damn chatters!!
God damn God!!!
2007-05-11 10:59:46 · answer #1 · answered by Malcolm Knoxville VI 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It depends on the answers and the details added by the asker. If the initial question is followed by details that are on topic with the question then it is not. If the answers steer the question into a new direction but not one of belief in God, then yes. As worded, it is a closed door/Yes or No question and should receive Yes/No answers.
2007-05-11 11:02:15 · answer #2 · answered by Tonya in TX - Duck 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but perhaps it belongs more in the polls & surveys section. In its simplest form, it merely requires a Yes or No. Not very interesting.
Now if you ask what god or gods, and what do you believe about him/her/them, you might get an interesting group of answers.
2007-05-11 11:02:33 · answer #3 · answered by auntb93 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
But...It's silly anyway. Technically the whole business of asking a question is chatting.
If you ask and I reply..then aren't we chatting?...Especially when one can add further details to somebody's enquiry as to what is meant by the question.
Yahoo rules sucks.
2007-05-11 11:07:57 · answer #4 · answered by Afi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not a very chatty form of chatting. It is too controversial and important to be just chatting
2007-05-11 11:02:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pst - Devils "believe": James 2:19
So believe not: Mt 24:23,26; 1Jn4
The objective is "know": John 8:32
"know" makes you free of "believe".
The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.
2007-05-11 11:03:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is, "doing you believe in evolution?" or "is evolution correct?" chatting also
The distinction is in the eyes of the beholder's bias.
2007-05-11 11:03:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋