Why cant we use the Marsahl plan once again. We are spending over 200billion dollars on war. We could have bought any disgruntled general in Iraq who would have gladly fought our war for us for say a billion dollars.
2007-05-11 10:32:37 · 9 answers · asked by zagz B 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
You inadvertently opened the borders with your illegal and immoral invasion. This way the terrorists are arriving in their hordes. 'Go figure' as the Americans would say !
2007-05-11 10:45:00 · answer #1 · answered by Teacher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One thing you hafta remember is IRAQ is typically considered abunch of normal type people , they keep persuading this as "terroist" no most people with half a brain would come to conclusion there just ordinary people , if you look at terroist most of them were from saudia arabia so one would predict thats where there coming from , and how americans continuously die , This national debt you bring up btw , the war is a fraction of this cost man , The tactics george bush got re-elected on is what cost the majority , television ads , radio advertisements , flying the plane around , oil subsidizing , cutting the rich tax breaks , your forgetting all these things you must realize this is the BIGGEST LIBERAL PRESIDENT weve ever had EVER hes more for spending on things then I AM! and im a hardcore liberal , but the problem is hes blowing the money on the wrong things if you ask me. Oh btw george bush's dad didnt get re-elected a second time so he wasted this type of money so he could get the chance his father never got (to go back to the fraction of the debt being the war thing) , left that part out sorry, lol
9/11 = Saudia Arabian terroist , which fleed to other countries to keep us the hell out , btw :-)
2007-05-11 17:52:55 · answer #2 · answered by creedgaminghosting 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, both. There were terrorists in Iraq before, and they've invited all thier friends over to fight the US.
"Why cant we use the Marsahl plan once again."
A 'Marshal Plan' can't work. Germany and Japan, whatever terrible things they did, were civilized nations with histories of industry, unity and respect for authority. Iraq is collection a of artificial borders imprisoning multiple ethnic groups who all hate eachother, and have been forced to co-exist, before, only out of overwhelming fear of a fascist mad man and his oppressive Arab Sunni regime.
2007-05-11 17:48:09 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
On 9/11, the terrorists were in New York City. After 9/11, we sent troops to Afghanistan and the terrorists followed us there. Then we sent troops into Iraq, and the terrorists followed us there. Now, when we send troops into Iran, they will follow us there also. This is all to the good as long as we don't bring our troops back to the US, because they will follow them here too.
2007-05-11 17:42:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They entered Iraq the moment we toppled Saddam's government and left a power and security hole for them to exploit.
2007-05-11 19:17:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
al-Qaeda wasn't in Iraq.
But Saddam's Baathist thugs were terrorizing the Iraqis to fall in line and support the regime.
So in a sense, there prolly were
2007-05-11 17:36:31 · answer #6 · answered by Daniel M. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There were no terrorist in Iraq neither AL-Qaida . as an iraqi,i can tell Saddam fought those terrorist .
2007-05-13 04:06:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We should concentrate on how we can stop people from joining the terrorist organizations, but instead we are fanning that hatred which feeds the enemy.
2007-05-11 17:41:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Too late now. Bush has destroyed a country and our good name.
2007-05-11 17:37:55 · answer #9 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋