IN GENESIS there are two contradictory stories of creation. In Genesis 1:20 & 21, "every living creature" is brought forth from the waters, including every winged fowl." But in 2:19 God brings forth "every beast of the field and every fowl of the air" from dry ground.
In Genesis 1:2, earth comes into existence on the first day, completely underwater. Only by the 3rd day were waters of the deep collected, and dry land formed. But in Genesis 2:4, 5, & 6, earth on the first day was dry land, unwatered.
The first story has trees made on the 3rd day and man formed 3 days later (1:12-13 and 26-31). In the second version man was made before trees (2:7, 9). If chapter 1 is true, then fowls were created before man. If chapter 2 is true, then they were created after man.
Version one teaches man was created after all beasts. The second is clear, Adam was created before beasts. (1:25,27 versus 2:7,19). If the Bible is Infallible which version is correct and why the need for two stories?
2007-05-11
09:54:53
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Worzel Gummidge
3
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
So those who see it as literal truth say the genesis story is up for "interpretation"? it was seen from a different "perspective"? I thought that ws anathema for "true believers"? it's either all right or all wrong, or does that naughty word "interpretation" come back into play, the one Fundamentalist's don't like. I not trying to be an ***, it's just that many people simply can't give me a straight answer or fall back on what others have told them. it's perfectly alright to not agree with Genesis and STILL have a deep belief in God.
2007-05-11
10:11:55 ·
update #1