Is the fact that a crocoduck would have trouble eating a banana proof...?

Question

...that God didn't intelligently design the banana for crocoducks, or proof that God didn't intelligently design the crocoducks for bananas?

Can we call the crocoduck idea "intelligent design"? Or is that a bit insulting to God? If it is intelligent design, does that make Kirk Cameron God?

Discuss.

[Sorry for the re-post. I somehow ended up in Arts and Humanities the first time.]

Answer 1

God Phoenix, you're brilliant! This is why it's blasphemy to dis him! I feel so stupid now!

Answer 2

i can see how this would end up in Arts, yes....

let me see. i didn't actually see this proof everyone is joking about, and now i'm sorry cause it seems like it was a blast! but i'd say obviously it was part of god's design that crocoducks were never intended to eat bananas - after all, if crocoducks ate bananas, there might be no proof left by now, and god's plans (or at least kirk cameron's) would have been thwarted by the crocoduck. as to whether he is god, i'd have to say no... but by some of the reactions going around here you'd never know.

Answer 3

I'd like to talk about the existence of God in a more intelligent and reasoned fashion.

I don't think the Kirk Cameron debate should serve as the springboard. Why has it been singled out??