English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I find it rather sad, that you guys do not have anything else to think about....and yet I find it interesting you are fixated on what Kirk had to say....maybe it has made you "think" and now you wonder if there could actually be a designer for nature and things of the earth. Even if his argument was not as strong as it could of been....Kirk still makes an excellent point.

2007-05-11 09:40:32 · 34 answers · asked by Mandolyn Monkey Munch 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Ok maybe blasphemous was the wrong choice of word- NO he is not God!!!
I do not hold him highly, but I respect him and Ray Comfort....and God is blessing their ministry- The question is, how many more questions that are bashing Kirk and Ray are going to happen?

2007-05-11 11:45:04 · update #1

34 answers

Kirk didn't do a great job, but he did a good one. And as strange as it sounds to me as one who grew up watching Growing Pains, Kirk Cameron is a wonderful man of God and someone I admire. I thank God for the ministry he and Ray Comfort are doing.

2007-05-11 09:44:47 · answer #1 · answered by TWWK 5 · 1 3

I find it funny that the people who use logic and reason to back up their claims don't get the point so they reduce themselves to belittling others.

So I will explain it again because it amuses me how simple it is and because it is so simple people still don't get it because in their mind it just cant be that easy....

As I said before, I think what people hate the most isn't the explanation of how a banana is used as proof of God's existence, but that the explanation is so simple and makes sense. For those who are commenting on it that don't even know what it is or just don't know what they mean then here is the explanation:

The banana -- the atheist's nightmare.

Note that the banana:

1. Is shaped for human hand
2. Has non-slip surface
3. Has outward indicators of inward content:
Green-too early,
Yellow-just right,
Black-too late.
4. Has a tab for removal of wrapper
5. Is perforated on wrapper
6. Bio-degradable wrapper
7. Is shaped for human mouth
8. Has a point at top for ease of entry
9. Is pleasing to taste buds
10. Is curved towards the face to make eating process easy

How this shows proof of God's existence is because it shows evidence of design. Each part of the banana has a purpose which is shown in the ten reasons. Purpose isn't created by chance it is created by someone who has something specific in mind that they want accomplished.

Same goes with the crockaduck, the sheep dog, or bullfrog you people like to make fun of, the point of the picture is that the idea is absurd which you obviously picked up on and made for them so to that degree thank you. What is even more hilarious is that you try to claim that they were trying to show something in that picture that should have existed, when in reality it was the point of the picture that they were trying to make. Your hero Brian "Sapient" says that the million little steps (micro evolution) adds up to one big step (macro evolution), if this is true then I side with Kirk and Ray. If evolution is true and it took millions of years for one species to turn into a completely different species (i.e. dinosaurs to birds as has been theorized) then by all accounts there should be a complete fossil of an animal that contained both traits of what it was and what it was to become, unless you are implying those steps where invisible. I mean those steps no matter how micro they are will eventually add up to something correct. History should give us a fossil record that is basically a time lapse camera of a change from a dinosaur to a bird or an apelike creature to a human, but it hasn't. As kirk said there are various types of horses (zebras, mules, donkeys, etc.) and various types of birds etc. but a bird will always breed a bird and a horse will always breed a horse. There is not one complete fossil that you could bring to the table that is half one thing and half another....any example you come up with I can assure you is a complete animal that can be labeled as a reptile, bird, mammal, fish, human, etc.

So when you criticize them for their analogy, which logically has no signs of inaccuracy, ask yourself what it is you are actually criticizing...the logic and reason or the simplicity. Is that what bothers you the most is that it is so simple yet makes sense and in your mind it can't be that simple?

2007-05-11 10:20:00 · answer #2 · answered by Bruce Leroy - The Last Dragon 3 · 0 0

I could think of better debaters than Kirk. I don't know why some people feel they are capable of being a voice for anything just because they once had a show on evening T.V..

Design theory is the best science but Kirk is not a scientist, I wish they had invited someone better equipped to attend, but the evolutionists weren't any better tooled.

2007-05-11 09:46:14 · answer #3 · answered by Truth7 4 · 1 2

Ok, that does it.

I promissed myself to not get too much involved into the whole banana thing. Even if it's rather funny.

But you just did it. "Kirk still makes an excellent point". That was awesome! Funniest thing I've read all day.

Sarcasm is a virtue, and you are a master at it. Praise you for that!

2007-05-11 09:46:06 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 3 0

I have to concure, How is it blashpemous if it regarding Kirk? Isn't blasphemy against god and not his followers? Also Kirk said he could prove the exists of god with out the bible and faith. He didn't get two steps before he resorted to both. He said this. If he couldn't do it, he shouldn't have laid down the challange. Also his "pictures" of missing links was spiteful and poor taste. If he is a man of god I would expect more of him then to try to make a joke out of the debate.

2007-05-11 09:45:48 · answer #5 · answered by punch 7 · 1 0

Who's Kirk?

2007-05-11 09:50:16 · answer #6 · answered by Dogbreath M 2 · 0 0

Yes, it has made me think.... about bananas! I have 9 questions left today but do not feel like it is enough for all the banana jokes I have lined up. So I'll just ask one here:

If Kirk Cameron did karaoke, would he sing that Gwen Stefani banana song or would he go old school and sing the "come mr tally man tally me banana" song?

2007-05-11 09:48:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm sorry, but when did you make Kirk your God? Last I heard, you can't blaspheme against an air-headed actor, even if his mythical beast is crocoduck. His use inept application of the argument from design is truly laughable. Everything he says disproves itself.

2007-05-11 09:50:37 · answer #8 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0 0

You think Kirk makes an excellent point? Bwah ha ha!

It is proven that Kirk is the devil in disguise. Banana indeed.

2007-05-11 09:46:46 · answer #9 · answered by atheist jesus 4 · 0 0

Unbelievable, mibandibee, that you could be so completely gullible as to think that those morons are anything but. Are you so blind that you accept any argument beginning with god is real? You are one funny little girl to believe that. You use the word blasphemous, so now we understand how blind you are. You probably take the bible at face value because you were told to. Poor girl.

2007-05-11 09:46:56 · answer #10 · answered by Fred 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers