1. Hilary has known 3 or 4 people to commit suicide in order to keep from testifying about her in a court of law ( I hope I don't know any one who would die to keep from saying I did nothing wrong, but to have 3 or 4 kill themselves?.... hmmmm!
2. Hilary is after power, I would never vote someone after power for the most powerful seat in the world, especially after the passing of the American Patriot Act which gives a gastapo power to the president (and is unconstitutional)
3. Hilary promised during her run for re-election to the NY senate seat that if she won, she would not run for the U.S. President- She broke that promise already, so how many promises that she makes during this campaign bid will she break?
4. Hilary only moved to NY after the promise that she would be made NY Senator. She knows nothing of the real concerns of the Real people of the State of NY. She is only interested in power.
To me than is enough reason to say NO to Hilary.
I will also be saying no to DEMOCRAT and REPUBLICAN or any other party, as they are all tearing this country down for power and wealth, or the illusion of it. It is time to get back to the idea that this country is OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE, and not just a good sound bit.
Watch the independant list. Something interesting may just happen.
2007-05-12 03:50:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vman 2040 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There were many people who were related to the Clintons with knowledge of their political strategies and businesses who were said to be killed suspiciously. This is one aspect why there are voters who are opposed to Hillary Clinton to become President.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Clinton will likely win.
2007-05-11 14:31:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because she was married to the biggest crook to live in the White House since Nixon. Hillary is a power hungry, lunatic with delusions of grandeur. She is too far left. She embraces socialistic ideals. I won't even get into Whitewater and her husbands impeachment and the pardoning of Marc Rich. Do I really need to go on?
2007-05-11 10:18:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because shes slick and smug, like all the rest of the Washington vote-whore politicians.
I'm sick to death of having the choice between two slick, lying, smug bastards who dont give a damn about the people or any of the issues. In election time, for them its just business as usual, trying to get elected. They dont care about anything except getting themselves into power. Thats their number 1 goal. Everything else is secondary to them.
Which is why I'm supporting former Sen. Mike Gravel. Because he is honest, passionate, and he tells the truth no matter what. Hes the kind of man who would tell the truth even if he knew hed get shot for it, which is much much more than I can say for Hillary.
www.Gravel2008.us (His campaign website)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gMlHv2lDqA (Highlights clip of Sen. Gravel from the 1st democratic debate. No other politician would dare tell the truth the way he does)
2007-05-11 06:32:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jesus W. 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because the Republicans (ie: G.W.B.) have proven that they just don't care what the American people say, they're going to do what they want to do and no one can stop them. I'm not a huge fan of Hilary Clinton.
Voting isn't choosing the right person for the job. it's trying to pick the lesser of two evils. That's why America's voter turn out is so low, typically all the candidates are rich, lying, backstabbers.
I guess if you're trying to convince someone to vote against Hillary, you could say that the Republicans are doing a great job and we should stick with them. (of course you'd be a liar too then)
2007-05-11 06:37:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by ablair67 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
the final ingredient on an identical time as billary's Whorehouse...er Whitehouse grow to be, they left with $2 hundred,000 nicely worth of artifacts that belong to American taxpayers. They have been busted, and made to return it. that doesn't count form each and every of the shady and unlawful deals her and billy have been in in Arkansas. the only reason they weren't prosecuted grow to be their buddy and appointee Janet reno the criminal expert regular refused to prosecute. it quite is merely a start up. it would take pages that are all attainable with a sprint internet analyze. you could think of Turning the white abode right into a bordello with Lewinsky is a private ingredient. i do no longer, i think of it quite is misuse of taxpayers money. We pay the costs there. If he needs to set an occasion to the yank persons that its super to dedicate adultery. i do no longer think of thats very own.To in front of thousands and thousands of human beings sit down in front of the digicam and say he did no longer have intercourse. is yet another super occasion of a president in furring which you and that i are all stupid. i think of boldface mendacity to the yank human beings is sufficient rationalization for every person to no longer choose bonnie and Clyde back into the White abode
2016-10-15 09:34:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whitewater
National Heath Care
Vince Foster
"I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, but what I decided to do was to fulfill my profession which I entered before my husband was in public life."
“Who is going to find out? These women are trash. Nobody’s going to believe them.”
"I’m not sitting here as some little woman ‘standing by my man’ like Tammy Wynette”
2007-05-11 06:38:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by roadrunner426440 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I lost all respect for her (not that I respected her much in the first place) when she stayed with her husband after the Monica affair.No self respecting woman would have done that,and she did it because she wants to go back to the white house,and if she (God forbid)goes back,will she bring her husband along?after all he's done to her. Not if I can prevent it!
2007-05-11 06:36:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Georgewasmyfavorite 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
Mrs. Clinton hasn't had the resolve to stand up to her husband who has cheated on her over and over again...which shows a total lack of respect for her.
If she doesn't have the resolve to stand up to him, what makes her think we should trust her to stand up to terrorists and/or others that may attempt to harm this country?
2007-05-11 06:31:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bob L 1
·
6⤊
2⤋
Because she's too pro-corporate.
Although she wouldn't sell us as far down the river as the current Freak in Chief, she will sell us down the river.
2007-05-11 07:50:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
0⤊
2⤋