Considering Arnold is the Governor of California, would you still recommend he still portray his part for T4 since Arnold revolutionized the blockbuster hit movie series?
2007-05-10 21:56:50 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
i personally think that he should be in it... but if he cant because of schedule and sh*t then he cant, enough said. the movie should at least end with john conner sending the terminator back in time to save him
2007-05-10 22:04:55 · answer #1 · answered by KingJames 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
actually YES
here's why
From the first day T3 was being made, the plan was a T4 where it is the future war between the machines and the survivors of the nuclear war.
that means the main charectors would be:
John Connor
Kyle Reese
maybe the girl from T3
and a bunch of machines.
really there is no need for Arnold to be in it anymore.
2007-05-11 05:20:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes we want Arnold back because without Arnold, the movie will not be as cool as before and it cannot be terminator at all. (Maybe the actor who played Arnold is too old).
2007-05-11 05:03:27 · answer #3 · answered by magnum2037 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, he is too busy with he duties a governor. The story could continue without him with a Terminator pursuing John Connor, or better yet, the final conflict/prequal where he dies and his wife lives and sends a look-a-like Terminator back in time ala T-3.
2007-05-11 09:52:16 · answer #4 · answered by bottleblondemama 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes,a terminator film without arnold cant be terminator at all.
2007-05-11 05:01:47 · answer #5 · answered by victoria 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋