Hitler was a great patriot who worked very hard for the betterment of the German people notwithstanding his near permanent pain from a chronic stomach complaint. Setting a fine example to modern politicians, he lived quite modestly and never used his office for personal gain.
Extensive Jewish control of the media and the ability of Jews to organise into a worldwide network has ensured that news and history programmes both have a pro-Jewish bias and even drama mainly avoids portraying Jews in a bad light. In many countries, this race has the benefit of tailor made laws specifically for its benefit.
e.g. Denial of the Jewish Holocaust is a criminal offence in many countries and in the UK, Jews are given the status of a race to protect them from discrimination but may behave as a religion to prejudice others.
In the US, the concentration of Jews in California and NY State with 55 and 31 (Highest and third) number of electoral votes also helps the disproportionate representation of Jews in the US.
2007-05-10 21:44:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Clive 6
·
4⤊
8⤋
Some strange misconceptions in your question.
I presume by "a small piece of land" you're referring to Israel. However Israel wasn't set up until after WW2 - largely because the world recognised the Jews needed a country of their own to avoid a repetition of the Holocaust. At the time Hitler was in power, Britain ran what was then Palestine.
I also don't understand what you mean by "how are these people so powerful". Who was powerful? Some Jews were reasonably powerful in the sense that they were wealthy or held political office. But many more, especially in places like Hungary, Poland and Russia, were farmers, shopkeepers or tradesmen - think Fiddler on the Roof. Not powerful at all.
And even if some of them were powerful, why was that a reason to kill them? I really don't understand your logic.
Thirdly, Hitler didn't just persecute Jews. He also killed millions of gypsies, homosexuals, and political opponents.
Fourthly, as others have pointed out, anti-semitism goes back way before Hitler. In part it was the legacy of anti-semitism fostered by the Church that allowed the Holocaust to happen.
Finally, what on earth do you mean by the 9/11 reference? It was Islamic extremists who flew the planes into the towers, not Jews. And many Jews were killed in the disaster, no matter what vile propaganda you may have read. You may as well say that if there was no America, 9/11 wouldn't have happened.
Frankly, I really don't know what you are trying to do with this question. You claim you're just trying to learn things, but you don't learn things by saying "was it a good thing that six million people died?" That could never, ever be a good thing and I think you know that.
2007-05-10 22:04:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Daniel R 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Hitler didn't see anything in the Jews that other people didn't see as well.
Anti-semitism has been around for hundreds of years and it didn't start with the 3rd Reich. As early as the 1300s it existed when the black death swept over Europe. Part of the reason for this was the Jews had an idea of keeping clean while the rest of Europe lived in filth which helped to spread the disease. The result was a lot of Europeans died but the death toll amongst the Jews was a lot lower which led a lot of people to believe that they had something to do with it.
The secretive nature by which they lived their lives, the "strange" rituals they followed and the fact that a lot of them controlled money made for a lot of resentment.
Hitler played on this fear and distrust that a lot of people had for the Jews and it worked in his favour. But it wasn't just the Jews he had a problem with, it was just about everybody else in the world including the Poles, Czechs, Gypsies, homosexuals, Serbs, Russians, Africans etc. They were all considered to be mongrel or "lesser" races than the pure Aryan that he had set up as the pinnacle of human creation.
2007-05-10 21:38:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by JavaJoe 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
What you are saying is back door Anti-Semitism, which, growing up in Gateshead-the Talmudical Centre of Europe, I can relate to but not endorse.You must remember, it was not just the Jews who he was after but, if he had his way, would have been Homosexuals, cripples, mentally disturbed and probably, old people. Like many deranged people, there are rational windows in his logic but essentially, he was a force for evil. However, what he was not, as has been suggested, was a coward.As far as the Jews being powerful, that is an extension of the strongest "freemasonry" type culture, allied to a natural intelligence and application of such. That however, does not make them any more likeable and their disregard (in Hollywood terms) for the effects of their actions is distasteful.
2007-05-10 21:33:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by busterdomino 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is really difficult to understand your question. Are you asking why some Jewish people own businesses, work hard and save their money? Do you consider hard work and striving for a good education a reason to be murdered? Or are you just ignorant of history? There is way too much history to go into here but to really symplfy, Hitler saw a way to blame the economic chaos in his country on innocent people so that he could get extreme power and steal their wealth for himself. He was also extremely prejudiced. He did not just kill Jews. He killed anyone who was different from himself, including gypsies, homosexuals, Black people and anyone with money that he wanted.
2007-05-10 21:43:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, we Jews, we're a big secret society! And we're all rich and we all have big noses and we run the government and the media!
What on earth is wrong with you? Most of the Jews Hitler murdered were poor people. The reason the Jews were able to prosper is because we found niches for ourselves wherever we went. There's no mystery about it.
If we were so powerful, why couldn't we prevent the Inquisition, when we were expelled from Spain and England and thousands of us lost our lives? If we were so powerful, why didn't we have Hitler assassinated? If we control everything, why didn't we make the US intervene in the war sooner? What absolute nonsense.
You don't get to say that 9/11 wouldn't have happened if Hitler had gotten rid of the Jews and then claim that you're not anti-Jew. Don't hide your bigotry behind what you heard "other people" say.
2007-05-10 21:29:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
11⤊
2⤋
even if what you sed is tru, which it aint,
he killed millions and not just jews.
even if u are anti-jewish you cant say u were anti-anything that is not blue eyes blond hair
p.s
yes hitler did see something in the jewish people, power, becuase the jewish nation is one of the oldest in recorded history, their roots go down by at least 3-4 thousand years! the roman empire didnt last a fraction of that, nor did the british empire or most empires for that matter, so when a nation (albiet for alot of time with no country but still a nation/race) have been around thatlong... think like this, if they put money in a bank for 4thousand years and let it gained intrested, its alot more than say the british empire which lastesd only a hundred or so years!
see my point?
those without power will always dispise those with, hitler dispised jews cos they had what he wanted
2007-05-10 21:24:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
10⤊
1⤋
No matter what is the reason of it, it's a massacre. I am a Chinese living in Malaysia, I think I understand the situation of Jews in WW2, they just killed for Jews' properties. Same as the reason of Jakarta, Indonesia Riots in 1998, those Indonesian just simply blame Chinese who live there take away their wealth, but the fact is, Chinese people earn their wealth by hardworking and wisdom. I think Hitler did those massacre for the same reason.
2007-05-10 22:07:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ok, please read and answer this.
Where do you think you are going with this question?
Look, the guy got human being to be cremated because of race/religion. Bad vs. good... hummm.
I don't understand your comment.
What do you think he saw that we don't see?
What is the relation with being powerful (really?), owning (not!) a small piece of land and what Hitler did?
Can you explain what would allow anyone to kill innocent people of all ages and not being bad?
2007-05-10 21:32:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gorilla 2
·
5⤊
0⤋
I think you will find that other people 'did see it' - anti semitism has been around long long before Hitler.
Just because you dislike or mistrust a group of people (whatever your reason may be) does not mean you have to exterminate every last one of them.
Anyone who would even consider gassing not only adult men and women but also children - and the infirm, is bad.
End of story.
I don't care whether or not you are pro or anti Jew, that's not the point - this is an issue of gross immorality.
2007-05-10 21:24:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by HP 5
·
14⤊
1⤋
there is little reason to torture. certainly, torture is a tutor of lack of ability to extract stable preparation. an quite able interrogator could have the flexibility to get preparation devoid of doing something different than chatting with the prisoner. often, a physically powerful interrogation will pass with a stunning, delicate intro, and the interrogator will attempt to endear themselves to the prisoner. they're going to attempt to get them to admit to a "lesser evil", and grant them an incentive to talk. people who recommend torture will tarnish usa of america's photograph, and definitely threat "retributive justice" human beings infantrymen being tortured. Torture seems to be little greater desirable than tutor that usa of america has the skill to be above worldwide regulation. the U. S. undermines worldwide regulation and treaties at its very own price. or possibly the Bush administration is in basic terms employing it as a tutor of settle on against the conflict on terror. of path, there are greater ideal the thank you to try this. alongside with making a severe attempt to transform the U. S. military from a militia designed to combat third technology conflict to 4th technology conflict.
2016-10-04 21:32:30
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋