sounds bad - like SE without a spade
2007-05-10 22:34:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
BAD. Not many can imagine a Terminator movie sans Arnold. He has been there from the beginning - he is an icon because of those movies. Tons of people, myself included, wouldn't waste my money on an Arnold-less Terminator movie.
2007-05-10 21:16:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He did three, The Terminator, Terminator 2: Judgment Day and Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines. He also did a computer generated cameo on Terminator Salvation.
2016-05-20 03:15:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the third one WITH arnold was a bad idea, so you can imagine how crappy a 4th one would be without him. I'd like to see The Rock as a Terminator, if they had to make one.
2007-05-10 21:16:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by N C 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Couldn't care less though if I did I would say bad.
2007-05-10 21:19:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by prcsdime 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No terminator movies again would be best.It's time to retire the franchise.
2007-05-10 21:24:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by marc g 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would not work - just as a Lethal Weapon movie would not work without Gibson/Glover.
2007-05-10 21:14:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Thats like a doughnut without a hole!
2007-05-10 21:30:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Probably good, he needs to concentrate on work right now...
2007-05-10 22:01:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hasta la vista, baby!
.
2007-05-10 21:19:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋