Is there actualyl any hard evidence that he took it? Sources would be a help thanks.
2007-05-10 16:55:45 · 13 answers · asked by DJ4LIFE 2 in Sports ➔ Baseball
Here is pretty hard evidence... his hat size grew from 7 1/8 to 7 3/4. That is a ridiculous amount. His SHOE SIZE went from 10 1/2 to 13. One of the side effects of HGH is cranium and extremity growth.
2007-05-10 17:22:01 · answer #1 · answered by apontec1 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The obvious growth of his melon is a give away but the one that should be looked at is Sosa. Look at old footage of him in the race with Mark McGuire then look at footage of him the year before. I mean if someone is bold enough to use a loaded bat in regulation play, he's not gonna sweat juicing' it up to get ahead. Then there was he retirement and comeback later. Enough time to flush his system?
2007-05-11 01:03:10 · answer #2 · answered by SteveKnowsSports 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
if the leaked grand jury testimony is to be believe, and NO ONE has ever said otherwise, Bonds admitted that the substances his trainers gave him would appear to be steroids.
He denies ever knowingly taking steroids
The perjury case was about that word 'knowingly'
In terms of the legal case, the fact he took steroids is not in ANY DOUBT.
2007-05-11 00:55:17 · answer #3 · answered by holdon 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He testified to using "the clear" and "the cream" in 2003. He fully admitted to taking these product which are designer steriods created by BALCO. He did claim not to know that they were steriods when he tood them...
2007-05-11 01:46:03 · answer #4 · answered by Kilroy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He testified that he used the items provided by his trainer, "flaxseed oil, etc". Victor Conte testified that those items were performance enhancing substances, "the cream and the clear."
2007-05-11 00:13:59 · answer #5 · answered by cramrgzk 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
no, but his trainer that has links to BALCO is refusing to testify, even going to jail in contempt of court. There are numerous circumstantial links as well. Also, He did bulk up a LOT around '99, so you make your own call.
2007-05-11 00:01:32 · answer #6 · answered by brewers07 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
look at him during the early to mid 90's and then look at him during the late 90's to early 2000's
there is a huge difference!
2007-05-11 01:07:21 · answer #7 · answered by Moore55 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Borrow "Game Of Shadows" from your local library there's plenty of information there.
2007-05-11 00:21:01 · answer #8 · answered by kwilfort 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES. He has admitted having done so, but "unknowingly" of course. Right!!
Chow!!
2007-05-11 11:44:13 · answer #9 · answered by No one 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
check this out
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/12/03/MNGGFA0UDU65.DTL
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2727325
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/baseball/mlb/03/06/news.excerpt/index.html?cnn=yes
he should be ban for life and not allowed in the hall of fame.
2007-05-11 02:58:02 · answer #10 · answered by Dodgerblue 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋