Do you consider Rev. Al Sharpton's comments about Mitt Romney to be bigoted?

Question

To Mr USA; Why do you answer a question with a question and why do you have to include President Bush when this has nothing to do with him? This is ignorant and childish and a typical liberal response. Words to the wise, grow up!

Answer 1

Sharpton is a businessman who uses "race" as his product.
He is a classic snake oil salesman who takes money,.
Too bad, the blacks don't recognize that Sharpton and his ilk are actually seeding hate ...
A Bigot yes...but even worse as he preys on the HIS"people"
....Sharpton's want blacks to accept the idea that their skin color is why they cant deal with life's potholes? Why because their skin color makes them inferior?
Skin color has NOTHING to do with an individual's desires, character, mental acuity and determination ... Sharpton and his ilk are actually selling the idea that skin color determines the value/ability of an individual...
....What is so pathetic is that so many buy into the idea that skin color somehow adds to or limits an individuals ability to pursue whatever goal they choose...No human is guaranteed success or an easy path without potholes..every individual can choose to walk around the pothole or decide that they cant deal with it and someone should come and help them..

Answer 2

It's still commonly held in Catholic and Protestant denominations that Mormonism is a cult based on heresy. That it is heresy in the sense of all that was declared heresy in the ecumenical councils is undeniable. But Mormons assert, and not completely without merit, that their doctrines align quite well with very early heterodoxies which were declared heresies in Roman controlled political councils. they would say the fact that their doctrines lost the vote in the councils does not mean they are wrong. I would argue that Mormonism can be labeled heresy from a simple examination of scripture and nothing more. So the notion that their doctrines are ancient and orthodox, but lost out to political corruption in the Roman Church is not convincing. In fact, they deal with this the only way they can, which is to claim the Bible is incomplete, mistranslated, or their "plain and precious truths" were excised by the Romanists. Of course we have ample documentary evidence that this specific claim is false. Probably more dispositive is the fact that there isn't a shred of evidence for the factual nature of the Book of Mormon, and abundant evidence that "The Prophet" Joseph Smith was a circus sideshow fraud in every sense of the word. But conversely, we have no evidence that all of the extraordinary claims of Christendom are other than a fraud, so in that regard, Mormonism's claims are no less or more worthy of derision. And who's the jerk giving me the thumbs down for simply telling the truth?

Answer 3

I don't even know what he said, but if you're asking if Al Sharpton made a racist/bigoted comment, I'd say "yes." That's all Sharpton is. It would be like Whites having David Duke as their "leader." Yikes!

Answer 4

No. I don't consider anything Rev. Al says or does. He's a joke. It is a disgrace, that the government gives him a fortune to run for president, when he is a piss poor clown.

Answer 5

Absolutely.

Answer 6

Yes. Just as Limbaugh condemned drug users, so has Sharpton condemned racist remarks. Yet he is guilty of the very crime he spoke against.

Answer 7

I don't generally think very highly of anything that comes out of Sharpton's mouth.

Answer 8

No more than Imus's statement. On yeah that was prejudice and bigotry and he loss his job and was rediculed by the countries libs. I waiting for the liberals to attack.

Answer 9

Sharpton is a racist, a bigot, and a sh*t-stirrer.

Answer 10

I thought it was all kinds of outrageous and yes, bigoted.