even if he ran on the independent ticket.
why or why not
2007-05-10 16:02:19 · 14 answers · asked by greatceasarsghost 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
(he decided to run as republican. right?)
2007-05-10 16:14:14 · update #1
Ron Paul is expected to be a good candidate because he voted against the war in Iraq and had excellent views on critical issues.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Ron Paul will likely win.
2007-05-10 21:51:32 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How could I ever vote for a Republican again? If Ron Paul is real and I feel he is , I would vote for him in a heart beat. But he would be the only Repub lican, I would even ever consider! I like this ticket, Ron Paul & John Edwards, Wow, what a Progressive couple they would make. Changes would been a happening, that's for sure. Can you imagine what it would be like to have 2 leaders that wern't totally corrupt, and actually inerested in saving this country. Personally, I don't think the average American Media Reader/ US Voter, has the sence to save themselves. I feel that the Bush Bandits and their use of Chemtrails, HAARP radio Waves, Media Propaganda, Subliminital Marketing, and a host of US Government Mind Control, has just about wiped out the common sence and reasoning ability of most Americans. I pray that I'm wrong, and I'll never give up hope, but Hell, even the Aliens are starting to leave Earth. They calculate that we blew it, and were going down.....
2007-05-10 23:24:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Why are there constantly at least 50 questions posted here about Ron Paul? He's probably going to be the first candidate to drop out. Okay, maybe second after Mike Gravel.
2007-05-11 01:02:27 · answer #3 · answered by I am that damn good. 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Responsible libertarians would vote for Ron Paul.
2007-05-10 23:08:15 · answer #4 · answered by pshdsa 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If it were him or Hillary Clinton, I would vote for Paul in a heartbeat. He is one of the few republicans out there who actually supports real conservatism, not this new breed of Conservatism, which is really a bunch of Fascist bull crap.
2007-05-10 23:06:27 · answer #5 · answered by truthspeaker10 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In a heart beat. The people of the U.S. want Ron Paul.
To the above idiot. I have a problem with morons that support current foreign policy.
2007-05-11 01:57:19 · answer #6 · answered by Jon S 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'd vote for RuPaul before I'd vote for Ron Paul.
2007-05-10 23:06:57 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course. VOTE RON PAUL in '08.
2007-05-10 23:10:06 · answer #8 · answered by James 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Because the two times I've seen him speak - once on a political show and the other in the debate - I thought he was a damn nutjob. Him and Gravel should have lunch together and forget the Presidential nonsense - it just isn't happening.
2007-05-10 23:16:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes I will if he is still in come November 08. He is not taking contributions from lobbyists, he is against free trade with 3rd world nations (bad for us and them), he wants to strengthen our boarders, put in place a comprehensive immigration program, get rid of the federal reserve a**holes and provide strong prosecution for corrupt officials. Of all of the candidates I have heard he appears to be most for the country and her citizens than any of the others.
2007-05-10 23:15:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋