They are not held accountable for their actions by their constituits ( only by their party who are stuck in the same mind set which he/she is because of their party's way of thinking )
2007-05-10 15:49:40 · 9 answers · asked by 1wiseguy 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
not sure it matters. Bush has never been held accountable for anything.
2007-05-10 16:11:15 · answer #1 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uh....But if you did away with lame duck presidents, then that means we would have to elect a President until he dies...
I think they call that Emperor, King, Czar, Ceaser, Dictator, Premier ect.
Didn't George Washington himself decline that, so there would be no King...
Sorry, just a thought, go by the Constitution...But, that's just me.........
2007-05-10 22:56:57 · answer #2 · answered by Ken C 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then a president like Bush could have a third term in office.
2007-05-10 22:52:47 · answer #3 · answered by BOOM 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You are on your way to some deep thinking. Don't stop and ask questions yet. You need to be much better informed before you can really dip into this pool. Do some more research and then get back to us.
2007-05-11 00:27:40 · answer #4 · answered by Al S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way I ever want a president for life. We need to move them on out periodically, that's for sure!!
2007-05-10 22:58:20 · answer #5 · answered by ash 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your proposal makes not sense at all. You do not seem to know how our government works at the most basic level!
2007-05-10 22:53:36 · answer #6 · answered by Coasty 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
So how do you get a stubborn president out of office, one who refuses to resign or accept responsibility?
2007-05-10 22:51:59 · answer #7 · answered by powhound 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Genius not everyone is a Quitter,
2007-05-10 22:54:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sounds good we will start after bush leaves
2007-05-10 22:52:55 · answer #9 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋