Someone has bribed them with free ticket.
2007-05-10 16:27:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Voltage Transformer 33kV 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah, if that said it, it's a bald-faced lie.
most reviewers that i have read said the second one was the best.
be very careful about how they word it tho. they usually figure out some way to wiggle out of those grandiose statements.
and tho i don't usually agree with critics, i think they got this one right.
P.S. i think i just saw the commercial and i don't remember seeing the word "All." and the rest of the line is a quote from a critic, not from the makers of the add--so if someone says it, they can quote it, regardless of whether or not it is true.
2007-05-10 22:34:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by michael p 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is false advertisment because Spiderman 3 was NOT the best one.
2007-05-10 22:35:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nemo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
not really, they can pay some critics tons of money to say it was good. It's all about the money. It's more of a sense of each person's own taste. I work at a video store and if I don't like a certain movie doesn't mean that the next person likes it.
2007-05-10 22:34:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They always lie with that crap. I remember just by chance watching an episode of Siskel & Ebert a long time ago and they gave a movie 1 thumb up, 1 down. Then I saw a commercial for that movie and it said 2 thumbs up from Siskel & Ebert.
2007-05-10 22:31:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a lot of movies do this .most of the ones that say critics agree-use some obscure little known reviewer from some city
not the big ones like ebert ,reoper .etc
2007-05-11 09:11:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by DS9ST 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No because maybe its all the critics they know.. who knows I dont watch tv
2007-05-10 22:33:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by lindsay_freas 3
·
0⤊
0⤋