Ron Paul is what politicians are supposed to be like, that unfortunately is why the powers that be will not allow him into office, they will kill him if he wins. I for one am voting for him because he has integrity and honesty.
2007-05-10 14:42:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by masterplumber75 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is unconstitutional. And yes, I'd vote for Ron Paul, if not for the fact that theres another candidate in the running who would also eliminate the income tax and who I agree with on every issue, which is rare. Thats former Sen. Mike Gravel of Alaska, Democrat.
But if (and its not that big of an "if") Gravel doesnt make it to the actual election, yes, I'd vote for Ron Paul, assuming he makes it there.
2007-05-10 14:53:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jesus W. 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Taxing income is NOT unconstitutional. The 16th amendment exists for the sole purpose on making it constitutional. I would not vote for anyone based on any one issue alone. That said, eliminating the income tax is a positive mark in my book.
2007-05-10 14:49:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by STEVEN F 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Almost half of federal tax money is spent on foreign aid. Waste is rampid, illegal immagrants in this country pulling taxpayers beneifts and not paying taxes, millions of dollars given to select canidates to run there run for president...run a business like this a see how long you stay afloat, but as long as its taxpayers being ripped off there more coming next year. RON PAUL will straighten this spending problem out...hes not in the race or politics for typical reasons, he for change, change for the better...good for the people...bad for the corrupt few who have been running the show for years. If the country was run with common sense spending it would be UNBELIEVABLE what could change and be done for the betterment of the country. So yes I would for that reason, among many others for Ron Paul.
2007-05-14 03:45:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. We need an income tax to support all that the federal government does for the people. The tax should be more equally shared, those who have should pay more, stop the loopholes for the wealthy. All of the things we take for granted would stop if we stopped the income tax. Taxation is not Unconstitutional.
2007-05-10 14:50:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by geegee 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
I would vote for Ron Paul, but I would not support replacing the IRS with a flat tax unless the 16th Amendment is repealed.
Otherwise, they'll end up sticking us with both.
2007-05-12 15:59:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by AngelaTC 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of that MR.Paul is a staggering guy with many great innovations approximately the thank you to alter this usa yet even he could comprehend that this usa or the different ought to in no way do away with income tax's.you spot that there are some issues the government controls that count on income taxes to stay to tell the tale or maybe even with the incontrovertible fact that we've alot of waste in government those businesses ought to in no way go away which includes,Police,fireplace,the placed up place of work,and Congressional salaries.Land taxes on my own ought to in no way pay for all of that or maybe with the incontrovertible fact that i've got self assurance the income tax must be decrease and shall we shrink the size of government to realize that purpose yet shall we in no way do away with that tax.
2016-10-15 08:17:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
I oppose ending the income tax; I think it should be made progressive, as originally intended.
You don't say what he'd do for tax instead.
Sales tax is regressive; the poor pay a much higher percentage of their income on sales tax than the rich.
2007-05-10 16:06:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
people don't know it, but the income tax only pays off the interest created by this country's debt.
so yes.
2007-05-10 14:49:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I'd settle for the Fair Tax Act proposals only please...
2007-05-10 14:42:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rmprrmbouncer 5
·
2⤊
0⤋