English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

I guess since there was no uproar when Sandy Berger stole and destroyed papers out of the NATIONAL ARCHIVE, he figured it wasn't that important to the Dems. Will people make up their mind which standard we are to hold our elected officials to. When do we hold them accountable for breaking the law? Only when we disagree with their politics or their boss?

2007-05-10 14:31:18 · answer #1 · answered by bopoppa 3 · 1 0

I don't think anything will come of this drummed-up
accusation...Democrats have tried to impeach or
destroy everyone now in Bush's administration.

How about the Democrat that removed archived
government papers by stuffing them in his shoes
and taking them home with him, which really is
an illegal act?????

There seems to be a lot of illegal actions going on
in both parties anymore.

2007-05-10 14:29:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

sir, I believe your mistaken. I have seen nothing of the accusation that you make. I do not believe that an attorney general would ever do anything of this nature (well maybe Janet Reno) and I have not yet heard this of Mr. Gonzalez. please review and reconsider your question. (the kinder gentler me with 1 slip)

2007-05-10 14:38:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

because he is a liar and a cheat and hasn't the slightest concern about the united states of america.

his job is to serve george bush, not the american people.

i have really had it with the bush years...

2007-05-10 14:27:55 · answer #4 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2 1

Hes just trying to bullsh*t his way out of the trouble he got himself into.

Dont look for anything reasonable or logical, you wont find any. Its just "oh-god-i-have-to-save-my-***" bullsh*t"

2007-05-10 14:36:16 · answer #5 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 1 0

Because he is a Republican. One of Bush's boys.

2007-05-10 14:28:02 · answer #6 · answered by lcmcpa 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers