The first philosopher responds the glass is half-full.
The second philosopher responds the glass is half-empty.
The third philosopher responds the glass is not.
The fourth philosopher responds the water is.
Which philosopher or philosophers implement the most
thorough philosophy? There is no wrong answer, the only
requirement is explanation of why each philosophy is
appropriate.
2007-05-10
14:15:29
·
7 answers
·
asked by
active open programming
6
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
My reasoning was as follows:
The philosophers were listed in
sequential order implying that the
first went before the fourth.
The first philosopher assumed that
the glass of water would be infinitely
full, and that is why the philosopher
was optimistic.
The second philosopher observed
society regarding the glass of water
and noticed that society was not
satisfied with glass of water. Therefore,
the philosopher concluded the
dissatisfaction came as a direct
result of the deficiency of water
to accommodate society.
The third philosopher observed
that after the second philosopher's
conclusion society did not equally
distribute the scarce water implying
that society ignored the glass as
a form of equal measure. Therefore,
the glass is not significant.
The fourth philosopher followed
from the third and concluded
the flaw was in society, and concluded
that water should be cherished
regardless of the control over
a container. Therefore, water is
significant.
2007-05-14
01:44:10 ·
update #1