English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It took the republicans 40 years to control both houses in Washington,Bush in less than six years has lost both,he has polarized his own party by siding with the democrats in important issues,and now his stubborn attititude on Iraq has the country turn against the republican party,is there a better ally to the democratic party then Bush

2007-05-10 12:57:27 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Annie,I'm a democrat that has voted republican because the dems just went to far to the left,but this president is ruining it for the GOP

2007-05-10 13:14:12 · update #1

10 answers

Just when one thinks Bush can't do much worse, he goes and proves otherwise.

2007-05-10 13:01:42 · answer #1 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 4 1

Annie is deluded. Even William Buckley Jr has admitted that Bush is destroying the Republican party. I think he is wrong. The GOP saw the beginning of it's demise starting back with Nixon, when Cheney and Rumsfeld and Kissenger ran the white house. That's when it started to lose it's integrity, at least in the last 40 years..

2007-05-10 13:39:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush didn't destroy the rep party republicans did they finally got in high office and they couldn't push away from the "pork" table the more they "ate" the bigger they got, now they can't move out of the way even if the house is on fire!

The best friend of a con man is an honest man's greed!

2007-05-10 15:52:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the GOP base is stronger then ever. Economy is up. National security is working. And the nation as a whole is Christian conservative. This leads to a GOP romp in 2008.

2007-05-10 13:35:53 · answer #4 · answered by mustagme 7 · 0 0

He could start a nuclear war. There'd be a lot of colateral damage, but there's a good chance the Republican party would be completely destroyed.

2007-05-10 13:01:48 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 5 0

It turns out hes the divider not the "uniter" he claimed he wanted to be.

I have a funny feeling that's what the motivation was from the start.

vote third parties.

2007-05-10 13:17:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The GOP agreed to this from the very begining, it shouldn't come as a big surprise.

2007-05-10 13:02:17 · answer #7 · answered by Jorge D 4 · 2 0

I'm not destroyed. Were the democrats destroyed by Clinton?

I guess the Democrats just like being the popular crowd, they conform and are inconsistent. The 1st agreed to the War now they don't. You can't trust them as a whole.

I'm still voting Republican for 08
[gimme my thumbs down, im expecting it, just shows you don't respect different views than your own]

2007-05-10 13:05:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

I think Bush can call this one 'Mission Accomplished'.

2007-05-10 13:36:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Don't tempt him. That idiot is working on killing democracy as we speak. Can you say Heil George?

2007-05-10 13:15:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers