Since the government has no respect for lives lost and ruined by war, there is no moral way they could be a steward for life that has it's beginnings in science. There is a failure to see worth in combat, therefore there is a failure to see anything short of perfection in civilian daily activities.
2007-05-10 13:03:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by navymom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why?
If there is no other way for a couple to have a child...
However, if the couple is capable but chooses not to, then no, they should not use (them).
The only problem I truely have is the price, given that it is several thousands of dollars for simple artificial insemination, and it fails 60% or more of the time... And more "reliable" methods cost astronomically more!
2007-05-10 19:56:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by jcurrieii 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
Reproduction is an intensely personal decision. The government should stay out of it. Implied right to privacy, y'know.
2007-05-10 19:56:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's an interesting angle on that question: Anyone who thinks abortion is illegal should also think in vitro fertilizatoin should be illegal (and not do it themselves) because extra embryos are often produced and destroyed.
2007-05-10 20:28:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋