I've heard of matriarchal societys in anthropology class.
If you're not familiar, the jist is, a women's duty is to stay with her family; her mother and siblings.
When she is ready to have children she doesn't marry, or live with her lover and his only responsibility is to pay for the mid wife. The male role model in the childs life is her brother, whom she shares a home with.
This society makes sense to me. She would always have the support of her family, and the romance with her lover would last so much longer. I don't think the man is sloughing off his fatherly duties, because he is taking care of his sisters kids.
What do you think?
2007-05-10
12:30:55
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Family & Relationships
➔ Marriage & Divorce
It's not unrealistic. Families used to live this way.
It's only when society decided multiple lovers was bad, that marraige became the norm.
2007-05-10
12:47:06 ·
update #1
From what I remember yes, the father is not important, it's the brother who teaches how to hunt, fish, etc.
In the circumstance that the brother died, I would imagine the father would step in.
I don't know what happens if she doesn't have a family of her own.
2007-05-10
13:03:31 ·
update #2