i think hitler was better but what do you think?
2007-05-10 09:56:48 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
HITLER IS WAY BETTER
2007-05-10 10:01:55 · answer #1 · answered by Mimi 2 · 0⤊ 8⤋
Dude you made such a stupid comparison. Its like saying which is nicer a tiger or a horse. Yes Iraqi citizens and American soldiers are dieing but Bush does not have any concentration camps. Hitler was a dictator and sent 6 million jewish people to death camps. Bush is not murdering millions of people because he hates them. Yes Iraqi's are dying but thats war. Maybe you should read about the holocaust. You are probbably one of those people who never had family that went through many of the holocausts. People like you allowed people like Hitler, Lenin an Stalin to come into power. Read the book Night and maybe you will see that Bush is definately not as bad! go ask some Jewish people this question they will have fun with it.
2007-05-10 14:55:41 · answer #2 · answered by Iamhere 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better? How so?
Speeches? Hitler
Ethics? Bush
Military? Neither, both want(ed) personel command
Support? Except for George Washington, there has always been a wide gap
Other then Hitler being good at speeches, he f-ed up a lot. Bush hasn't done nearly anything close to being as bad, others would say differently though.
2007-05-10 12:49:09 · answer #3 · answered by Chase 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
With respect to what? Each has his strong points and his weak points. Both have similar ideas regarding governing but Adolf, of course, was a little stronger in the practice because his country didn't have checks and balances and was recovering from WWI and the depression when he came to power. Hitler was a much better speaker than Dubya. Hitler grew up poor and Dubya grew up rich. Hitler actually was in battle and wounded in WWI where Dubya was in the Texas National Guard stationed in Alabama and helping one of his Daddy's friends in his political campaign. Both were into drugs at a point in their lives. There are many more compairisons one could make. Bush is nuts but I don't think he is nearly as nutty as Hitler and for that I give our dear fearless leader an edge.
2007-05-10 10:05:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The difference is that you morons can come on here and talk crap about GWB and that is ok. With hitler he would have put a slug in you or gassed you. Hitler was an animal and a brutal murderer. Bush atleast has morals and compassion for people. Because his ideals are different than your he is now like hitler?
you people make me ill.
2007-05-10 10:39:40 · answer #5 · answered by gabeerwin 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Better how?
Morally? Bush.
Ethically? Bush.
Charisma? Hitler
Ability to lead the people? Hitler
Ability as a general? Hitler
It all depends on how you define "better"
2007-05-10 10:01:31 · answer #6 · answered by Captain Moe 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think today's liberals would like Hitler better. He killed those who disagreed with him as well as killed those he didn't like. If liberals weren't such pansies they'd be doing the same thing now. Instead they are focusing on restricting freedom of speech by casting all dissenters as 'evil' or 'ignorant' or 'wrong'.
I wish I could send you and your buddies back in time to hang out w/Hitler. He'd love you.
ps - Bush is better because he is trying to limit casualties by having a very restrictive Rule of Engagement in place. The cowards can hide in a Mosque and kill our soldiers but we cannot level the Mosque via air power b/c then you and yours would be so upset at how mean we were to those poor cowards.
Cheers
2007-05-10 10:42:20 · answer #7 · answered by brett611 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In terms of a basic analysis, it will have to depend on how you define "better", but overall, I would rather live as a liberal Democrat for 8 years under Bush then as anyone for 12 years under Hitler.
2007-05-10 10:10:40 · answer #8 · answered by Sam N 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why cease at a million/2 why no longer purely say all Why only 70% why no longer ninety%? might desire to of been a reason the Saudi King presented to pay each and every united statesservice guy/ladies interior the gulf war $10,000 each and every in the event that they killed Saddam What might that reason be? As an aside he became grew to become down because of the fact the united statesmilitia are actually not mercenaries
2016-12-17 09:25:41 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, Hitler was better. Why doesn't Yahoo have a rolling e yes smilie? Why do I even respond to these ignorant questions? Oh, points, that's right. +2.
2007-05-10 10:09:25 · answer #10 · answered by WinOne4TheGipper 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler is dead. President Bush is alive and doing well. I think President Bush is way better off.
2007-05-10 10:02:45 · answer #11 · answered by regerugged 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋