Are People That Subscribe To Islamic Beliefs The World`s Main Threat To World Peace?

Question

I know what kind of crappy liberal answers I am in store for here......Read the question again, then answer......or blab your pro-terrorist propaganga...I, and many of us will see your answer for what it is. Put your emotions aside for this one.......Or look like a fool. Yes, my question was mostly rhetorical.....But what do you think ?

Eric- The Ironic thing is that you need and love oil just like the rest of humanities populous that enjoy civilized lifestyles.....You love oil and you......don`t know it.

olcay- We know your thumbs up count is bogus. Thanks for your interest however...

matt !!!- How could you get three thumbs down (so far) ??? That says alot about the fools that hate America and even more to those that think their Anti-American opinions are worth considering.

unforgiv- Yes. Give up. Don`t fight. How liberally leftist of you.

Answer 1

On a whole I believe you're correct. A religion that states you must kill the infidel wherever you find them sounds pretty threatening to me . Convert or die or be underneath (2nd class citizen to all muslims) is threatening to me because I would die before I gave up my faith in Christ. Muslims sometimes say we feel this way only because of 911, and the actions of 20 men. On the contrary, Some of us were aware of what was going on way before then. How many times did they try to bomb the trade center before 911? How many U. S. embassies have been bombed over the years.How many school children died in the school bombing in Russia? How many of us saw the muslim masses and the children dancing in the streets when thousands were killed on 911?How many of their children are taught to hate and to chant "death to America"?How many members of alquiada and hesbolah etc. are there? More than 20. Many many more.Oh and it's not just some that stray away and make up their own beliefs... the teachings are in their "books".

Answer 2

No an individual who subscribes to muslim beliefs is not a threat. The apparent schism in the Muslim world is. Look at the sectarian violence we have observed over the years. Just look at civil wars going on in Africa and the rest of the middle east. The violence between the different sects is disrupting the peace.

Answer 3

A good - and overdue - question.

As a citizen of the UK, I am aware that the Muslim population are growing. I am also aware that 99.9% of these people are peace-loving people. Britain has always been a country that believes that people are entitled their religious beliefs.

A tiny minority of muslims are causing mayhem, and giving muslims a bad name.

As a British subject, I have absolutely no trouble with muslims - I even admire their dedication to their religion. A lesson to be learnt by the British.

So, to answer your question. No -muslims are not the main threat to world peace. But yes, muslim factions are a bigger threat today to world peace than the Russians ever were.

Answer 4

YES The islams want to dominate the world. Do you see the peace loving muslims in this or any other country standing up against their own kind. The talk a good game. They will tell you they are not like the militant islams yet I don't see them doing anything to take care of their own kind. It is time they walked the walk.

Answer 5

Well since Islam literally means Peace, I don't know how you could call Muslims a threat to World Peace. Every religion has extremists that take the religion beyond what it actually is.

Maybe you should study Islam or the Quran some before you begin to judge people.

Answer 6

Islam was created by Mohammed as a protection from the slave making techniques of the christian religion. The only time Islam has been involved in international violence is when christians try to overrun them with their slave making ideology or conquer them outright as in the holy christian crusades, past and present. It has protected the Arab world from christian managed slavery quite successfully except in Turkey which was a christian slave hell hole before the Moslems came to dominance there.

Answer 7

If you group "Islamists", those who believe a country's law should be derived from the Koran instead of secular gov't and Islamofascists, then, yes.

fixitnow, you're an idiot along with anyone one that thinks the Christian persecution in Africa is muslim sects fighting amonst themselves. While there may be separate war lords in little clashes, you will find that most all violence in Africa is Muslim/Christian.
""The National Islamic Front (which has attempted to rename itself innocuously as the "National Congress Party") is essentially unchanged since it seized power from a democratically elected government in a 1989 military coup, deliberately aborting Sudan's most promising peace process since independence in 1956. With the exception of Islamist ideologue Hassan El-Turabi-the mastermind of the 1989 coup who split with his former allies and is no longer part of the government-the same brutal men still control the NIF 16 years after it seized power. Field Marshal Omer El-Beshir retains the presidency, and Ali Osman Taha-arguably the most powerful man in Sudan-serves as vice president and controls the terrifyingly efficient security services. Nafie Ali Nafie, Gutbi Al-Mahdi, and other longtime members of the NIF serve in various advisory capacities. And Major General Saleh Abdallah Gosh, recently flown to Washington by the CIA, retains control of the Mukhabarat (Sudan's intelligence and security service) even as he is among those members of the NIF indicted at the International Criminal Court in The Hague for crimes against humanity in Darfur.
These are the men who settled on a genocidal response to the insurgency movements that emerged in Darfur in early 2003. But the NIF'S history of genocide goes back much further than the current catastrophe in Darfur. Animated by a radical Islamism and sense of Arab racial superiority, the movement engaged in genocide almost from the time it seized power. A year ago, seasoned Sudan watcher Alex de Waal of the British group Justice Africa wrote for the London Review of Books what remains one of the best overviews of the Darfur crisis. In the piece, he observed that genocide in Darfur is not the genocidal campaign of a government at the height of its ideological hubris, as the 1992 jihad in the Nuba Mountains was, or coldly determined to secure natural resources, as when it sought to clear the oilfields of southern Sudan of their troublesome inhabitants. This is the routine cruelty of a security cabal, its humanity withered by years in power; it is genocide by force of habit. As part of a ghastly jihad, the NIF conducted relentless military assaults on civilians and enforced a humanitarian aid embargo that lasted more than a decade.""
From http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Africa/Genocide_Darfur_Hx.html

Answer 8

Yes, Yes, and ten thousand more yeses!!! All but one of the military conflicts throughout the world involve radical Islamic factions, and it won't be long before it becomes the norm in our own country if we pull out of Iraq. They have to be stopped somewhere and better there than on our own homeland. I for one, wish we would finish off Iran and Syria as well, and do it right, not as a police action. Look at what we had to do in WWII to stop the war. If we let it spread anymore we might be bombing our own homeland.

Answer 9

Depends on how you look at it.

Could be yes because of their reluctance to sell themselves into western civilization which inevitably leads to conflict.

Could be yes because they violently oppose a western presence.

Could be yes because their Koran condones violence.

But in actuality I am less concerned about muslim terrorists because there is practically no chance of a large scale war, I'm more concerned with growing tensions with Russia and the rise of China.

I think that over the last 50 years especially, globalization and capitalism has been spreading all over the world and there are , of course, going to be people who react irrationally to our intentions of a global economy.

The Islamists arn't the first people to react violently and they wont be the last.

Answer 10

Most Muslims are not violent. Of all the billions of Muslims in the world, only a very small number are extremists and threaten world peace. Unfortunatey, these few extremists are disrupting world peace, but then again terrorism has gone up exponentially since Bush's attack on Iraq. The question then becomes, is the Bush administration handling the threat of terrorism responsibly? Most people in the world, including most people in the U.S say NO. I'm with them.