"The theory of Big Bang nucleosynthesis predicts the rates at which various light elements are synthesized in the early universe, giving results that are generally consistent with observations. The Big Bang model also predicts the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), a background of weak microwave radiation filling the whole universe. The discovery of the CMB in 1964 led to general acceptance among physicists that the Big Bang is the best model for the origin and evolution of the universe."
2007-05-10 10:00:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. The temperature and distribution of the CMB matches very closely with values predicted by the inflationary hot big bang model.
In addition, the COBE (COsmic Background Explorer) and WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe) satellite measurements strongly confirm the hot big bang origin of our universe, and point to a date of origin of about 13.7 billion years ago.
2007-05-10 08:32:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
definite. "The cosmic microwave history radiation is one in each and every of many reasons that all of us comprehend that the super Bang easily got here approximately." - Lawrence Krauss, physicist "the full ability of the universe is exactly 0, because of the fact gravity could have unfavorable ability. The unfavorable ability of gravity balances out the advantageous ability of count. in elementary terms this manner of universe can start up from no longer something. The regulations of physics enable a universe to start from no longer something. you do no longer desire a deity. Quantum fluctuations can produce a universe." - Lawrence Krauss, physicist For extra relating to the super Bang and its implications, watch the video on the 1st hyperlink - "A Universe From no longer something" by potential of theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss, examine an interview with him (on the 2d hyperlink), or get his new e book (on the third hyperlink). And, see the 4th hyperlink for "The Universe: huge Bang to Now in 10 ordinary Steps."
2016-11-27 00:48:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by leister 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
One of many, yes, but unusual in that it can be directly and actually observed. If you were looking at a large lake, and there were smaller & smaller ripples moving towards the bank all around it, would you not reasonably assume something had fallen in the water at some previous point in time?
2007-05-10 08:35:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since the expansion rate of the universe has now been conclusively proven to be accelerating the big bang theory is falling apart since if it really happened the expansion rate should be slowing down. The big bang theory is all but dead science at this point.
2007-05-10 08:36:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Most definitely look here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WMAP
2007-05-10 08:32:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gene 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
True.
2007-05-10 08:32:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋