religion supports
2007-05-10 08:15:31 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
It comes down to a matter of rights. Woman’s rights vs unborn child’s rights. Sad to say but the woman’s really do win out in my judging.
That is to say you give unborn things rights? Why not look at the unborn baby as part of the woman’s body not its own individual self. Would you stop someone from cutting off their arm? What if it was cancerous?
Good thing I don’t have to make these decisions. Sad to hear about a friend’s dead un-born baby. He didn’t even know until after the fact. He is so good with his nephew. He would have made a great dad.
Its the saddest thing that I ever seen. Make me stop and sing about the saddest thing. And tomorrow it fades away.
Somone told me most babies are not planed.
2007-05-10 08:53:57 · answer #1 · answered by grey_worms 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
most simply because abortion ends a life. no matter when people want to claim life begins, an abortion ends any possibility of life.
add to that the fact that abortion has been latched onto by fringe groups to destabilize, victimize and control women as a group & even more specifically those in the lower financial brackets.
Supporters claim that it is a right of a woman to choose what happens to her body.
my stance & those of many women i socialize with, is that the woman chose when she did not exercise either the self control to abstain or made the choice not to use contraceptives. i know that there are situations that fall outside this generalization but they are the exception, not the norm.
2007-05-10 08:28:10 · answer #2 · answered by Act D 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because the life of a human being is being taken ! It can cause infertility to the mother ! It causes the baby intense pain and distress ,the baby is removed in pieces not as a complete being.How can anyone possibly think that is acceptable.There are circumstances that could be excused though .I guess if the mothers life was in danger or the baby was seriously impaired, but even then he /she has a right to live and doctors do make errors of judgment sometimes.
2007-05-10 08:52:04 · answer #3 · answered by Lindsay Jane 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it doesn't have to be for religous reasons. I'm against abortion because it's performed almost exclusivly by women in their mid 20's to mid 40's who do so out of convenience. Don't believe me? Check abortion statistics by pro-abortion organizations like Planed Parenthood. The idea that you will terminate a childs life because you don't feel like being inconvenienced by your mistakes is insane and barbaric. The only way in which it gets justified is by pro choice organizations attempting to use symantics to change the definition of the word "baby" or life.
2007-05-10 08:21:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I am against abortion for the reason that it is an unnecessary medical proceedure, like most of plastic surgery done in this country. Being pregnant is NOT bad.
Plus, the horror stories of punctured vagina walls is really discouraging.
2007-05-10 08:26:58 · answer #5 · answered by kokayi137 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This question sucks.
2007-05-10 08:25:41 · answer #6 · answered by Dash 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋