WASHINGTON - President Bush, under growing political pressure, agreed Thursday to negotiate with Congress on a war-spending bill that sets benchmarks for progress in Iraq.
The turnabout in Bush's position came as Republicans expressed anxieties about the war and the House was expected to pass legislation that would cut off funding for U.S. troops as early as July.
dems 1 repubes negative 120 billion
2007-05-10 06:58:05 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
come on question mark go and ask your questions in another post
2007-05-10 07:02:26 · update #1
lol. I hate fat people and ones with zits.
2007-05-10 07:03:08 · update #2
bbriggs has consistently used sedition in his posts. He's chosen sides in WWIII. So have many of us. OUR President, President Bush, has been wiser than the whole of the media combined. While the media share his low ratings as if he's stupid for having them, they reveal what they truly value: popularity and power.
He didn't plant WMDs in Iraq, though it would have made him more popular;
He hasn't done many of the things that would have made him popular.
Do you want a candidate that goes after "popular"? Is this what the socialist and/or seditious elements of our society prize? Is it true that a President isn't wise unless he agrees with someone like bbriggs?
Silly the power trips these posters get on. Unwise to publisize it so much though.
2007-05-13 04:15:41 · answer #1 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How do you figure Dems 1? The President stated a long time(before the Democrat congress) ago that he would never support a timetable and would only support a withdrawal plan that included benchmarks along the way. Sounds like he is getting what he wanted in the first place isn't he?
Shouldn't you be in class right now anyway?
2007-05-10 07:21:06 · answer #2 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i does no longer complication plenty approximately that. i'm going to attempt to respond to your question without being violated. You worry-loose assumption is incorrect there is no longer a black vote nor a white there are human beings of shade on the two sides. individuals of African respectable do no longer vote as a block. you're shocked to locate many are in basic terms like.As for Democrats using blacks, politicians use all and sundry. u.s. is now no longer divided alongside the traces of race. The squeaky wheel gets the grease and so we hear the raving of that dying breed of ignorant uneducated racist who see the worldwide in terms human beings and them. by potential of the time comes for the national election all of which would be previous information. and ultimately i'm neither wealthy, extra knowledgeable nor am I youthful. What I do see is that we are recording a extra special strengthen in voter registration between Democrats approximately 20%. and that they are youthful electorate.
2016-11-27 00:34:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Benchmarks are one thing, timetable another! How come the democrat congress hasn't pulled our troops out yet like they said they were going to?
2007-05-10 07:01:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I heard his approval rating was 28%!! Maybe someone explained to him what that number meant. Cuz we know he's not a numbers man...
2007-05-10 07:21:34 · answer #5 · answered by ♥willow♥ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't be see quick to wave the white flag. Keep the faith(in i don't know what)but just keep the faith.
2007-05-10 07:03:17 · answer #6 · answered by rockstarhooligan 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Who was the last president not embroiled in controversy?
2007-05-10 07:00:54 · answer #7 · answered by ? ? ? ? 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Well now...a slippery slop or a drop?
2007-05-10 07:01:51 · answer #8 · answered by edubya 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Watch who you're calling a chimp fatso!!
2007-05-10 07:01:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Do you do your own poll now? lol
2007-05-10 07:02:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋