so why doesn't the librals suport it is it because they is afared that they cant admitt that gerge bush is teh greatist president i meen i faught in german, japan, russa, and iraq and i have seen how hapy the iraqes are and one little girl handed me a flower and said she was thankfull that the ameracans came and libralated her and she said that one day she wanted too live in amarica so she could injoy the fredoms that the librals are trying too tak away from us i cant beleve it she is now 20 and i am thinking about marrying her so she can come hair and enjoy our fredoms anyway i have fought hard to libralate peeple all over teh world and if i can save literally milions of people from tyrany then i cleerly am smarter then so stoopid librals who want to take a way our fredoms and who do not support gerge bush beccause they cant recognise that he was sent by god to do gods work and god told him to envade iraq so he could libralate my new wife i nearly killed hitler once but some libral st
2007-05-10 05:48:59 · 14 answers · asked by gopaokay 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
your story is really doubtful ww11 and iraq? you must be the oldest soldier in the army
do you know more than these generals
CONCORD, N.H. - Three retired generals challenged a dozen members of Congress in a new ad campaign Wednesday, saying the politicians can't expect to win re-election if they support President Bush's policies in Iraq.
"I am outraged, as are the majority of Americans. I'm a lifelong Republican, but it's past time for change," retired Maj. Gen. John Batiste told reporters.
"Our strategy in Iraq today is more of the same, a slow grind to nowhere which totally ignores the reality of Iraq and the lessons of history," Batiste said. "Our president ignores sound military advice and surrounds himself with like-minded and compliant subordinates
or more than George Bush SR?
George H.W. Bush had this to say in a 1998 Time article, when asked why US/UN forces didn't go after Saddam Hussein after Iraqi forces were pushed out of Kuwait in the Gulf War.
"We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-cold war world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the U.N.'s mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the U.S. could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different--and perhaps barren--outcome."
Seems like besides running the CIA and being a one term president, Bush Sr. was a a fortune teller, for his own kid.
2007-05-10 05:55:19 · answer #1 · answered by Deidre K 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you fought in WWII AND Iraq, then you should call Guinness, because you would be the oldest soldier. Let's do the math...
WWII ended in 1945 and let's say that you were 17 then. It's 2007 now, so that would make you at MOST 79 years old. Okay, the Iraq war (this one) started in 2003, so you were only 75. Or do you mean the 1st Iraq war? That was 1990. So you could have been 62 in that war.
Somehow, this doesn't seem 'right', ya know? But thank god we live in america where you can have 'free speech'. Thank you for your opinion on the war.
2007-05-10 05:58:02 · answer #2 · answered by words_smith_4u 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are a bullscheisse artist. If you were in WW2 you couldn't have been in Iraq for the war or anything else. You can barely get around with your arthritis and poor vision. Which asylum did you escape from?
2007-05-10 21:40:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You like wars, that's all.
The invasion of Irak was wrong, and with great errors, at a high cost. You didn't need to go there, and Middle East is now worse.
What is happening is that Bush drives you to a war that only benefits the Chinese. Now you have less international support and many angry muslims. You are weaker now. Sorry about that!
2007-05-10 05:54:15 · answer #4 · answered by Opuntia imbricata 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
that would make you at least 75 when you went to Iraq. Also, you can't be an American because we were not at war with Russia (with an "i") in the last 60 years. If you're going to shovel it, at least try to make it believable.
2007-05-10 05:56:59 · answer #5 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It truly hurt my head to read your rambling post.
For you to have served in WWII, you would have to be, what, 80 years old? And you served in Iraq, as well? That's mighty impressive, having a 60 year career.
Really, now, how old are you in real life?
2007-05-10 05:57:59 · answer #6 · answered by Sgt Pepper 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Liar no one who fought in WW2 could have fought in Iraq.
2007-05-10 05:55:31 · answer #7 · answered by October 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Poser!
2007-05-10 05:53:46 · answer #8 · answered by Who's got my back? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take your medication dear.
2007-05-10 05:52:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
They have Internet at the asylum?????
2007-05-10 05:54:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋